Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Statement of <br /> Michael J. Riehm, A.I.A., Owner <br /> Riehm Owensby Planners Architects <br /> Wednesday, 19 July 2006 <br /> Sheraton Keauhou Bay Resort & Spa <br /> <br /> In consideration of <br /> Resolution No. 381-06 (Draft 4) <br /> Relating to Postponing Action on Rezoning Applications <br /> In the Districts of North and South Kona until the <br /> North and South Kona Community Development Plan <br /> Is Adopted by Ordinance, Or Until January 1, 2007, <br /> Whichever Shall Occur First <br /> The Honorable Stacy Higa, Chair <br /> The Honorable Virginia Isbell, Vice-Chair <br /> Members of the Hawaii County Council <br /> 25 Aupuni Street, <br /> Hilo, Hawaii 96720 <br /> Aloha Chair Higa, Vice-Chair Isbell and Members of the Hawaii County <br /> Council: <br /> I am Michael J. Riehm, a member of the Hawaii Leeward Planning <br /> Conference (HLPC), an organization committed to sound planning, wise use <br /> of our resources, and effective government process. <br /> If this resolution is being stimulated in part by such concerns, then we would <br /> ask the Council to consider both the stimuli and responses in a <br /> comprehensive manner. For example, at present, it is unclear how <br /> postponement of rezoning applications pending updating and implementing <br /> by ordinance, the CDP for North and South Kona, will address existing <br /> infrastructure concerns without discussion of both short-term (to meet <br /> current needs) and long-term (to meet needs stimulated by future growth), <br /> commitment to and funding of, identified infrastructure requirements. <br /> While Resolution 381-06 does not provide a mechanism for dealing with the <br /> causes of public frustration such as existing traffic congestion and insufficient <br /> road infrastructure; rezoning often does include mechanisms and the <br /> opportunity for providing roads, water systems, school and commercial sites, <br /> and other infrastructure. Such opportunities may be lost to the community if <br /> consideration of rezoning applications is delayed by this resolution. For <br /> example, one way to deal with congestion is to encourage commercial and <br /> shopping development in areas closer to existing residences to lessen <br /> commute time and distances, thereby eliminating some of the traffic on main <br /> roads, and such opportunity may come through rezoning. <br /> As the County and State continue to look at planning and land use, this <br /> resolution rather than providing much needed clarity and consistency, <br /> appears to support erosion of property rights through poor definition <br /> thereby increasing the level of uncertainty for land development, and <br /> effectively transferring rights to use of property from the property owner <br /> through the political process, to the general public. <br /> 1 of 2 <br />