Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Honorable Stacy K. Higa, Chair <br /> and Members of the County Council <br /> COUNTY COUNCIL <br /> Page 2 <br /> August 16, 2006 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The various General Plans all identify four basic types of resort areas: "major", <br /> "intermediate", "minor", and "retreat." This is sec. 14.7.4 in the 2005 General Plan. <br /> A "major" resort has a maximum of 3000 visitor units, an "intermediate" resort has a <br /> maximum of 1500 units, a "minor" resort has a maximum of 500 units, and a "retreat" <br /> resort has a maximum of 50 units (100 were allowed before the 2005 General Plan.) <br /> Because of their relatively small scale, the retreat resorts are the only resorts that are not <br /> always specifically mapped in the LUPAG map. <br /> There is no listing of Honokohau or Kealakehe as a resort area of any kind in the 2005 <br /> General Plan, and no listing is proposed with Amendment E-4. In the 1989 General Plan, <br /> there was an "Intermediate" resort listed at Kealakehe and a "minor" resort listed at <br /> Honokohau on p. 81. These listings were removed along with the corresponding LUPAG <br /> map resort areas in the 2005 General Plan. <br /> <br /> The 2005 General Plan explains the purpose of the various land use designations on the <br /> LUPAG map on p. 14-7. "Resort Node" and "resort area" are two described categories <br /> where hotels are specifically mentioned as a use, and it is very clear that a major proposal <br /> such as the Jacoby development fits within one of those two resort categories. The <br /> General Plan describes an "Urban expansion area" as allowing "for a mix of high density, <br /> medium density, low density, industrial, industrial-commercial and/or open designations <br /> in areas where new settlements may be desirable, but where the specific settlement <br /> pattern and mix of uses have not been determined." The description in the 1989 General <br /> Plan was similar, but also had this sentence, which has been removed: "Within areas <br /> designated for development as resorts, portions of the resort area may be included in the <br /> urban expansion area." The removal of this sentence in the 2005 General Plan makes it <br /> clearer that a "resort" and an "urban expansion area" are different, but even under this <br /> sentence, the urban expansion area would have to be within an area designated in the text <br /> of the General Plan as a resort to allow resort development. <br /> <br /> The Jacoby development for Honokohau Harbor proposes 1700 timeshare and about 800 <br /> hotel units, for a total of about 2500 units. This clearly constitutes a "major resort" in the <br /> General Plan. To authorize zoning for a project of this size, the General Plan would have <br /> to be amended to list the area as a "major resort" on Table 14-5, and the LUPAG map <br /> would have to be amended to show a "resort node." If the project were scaled down to a <br /> maximum of 1500 visitor units, it would still need a General Plan amendment for an <br /> "intermediate resort" designation on Table 14-5, and a "resort area" designation on the <br /> LUPAG map. <br />