My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0939.040 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0939.040 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 2:03:18 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:04:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0939
Point
040
Author
Charles Flaherty
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 8/01/06
Document Relationships
COM 0939.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
RES 383 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> 4 _ <br /> <br /> In February 2004, Menehune assigned its Honokohau DHHL lease to JDI. <br /> <br /> In October 2004, the BLNR accepted JDI's proposal for a 500-acre master-planned project with a Land <br /> Use Plan that requires Resort zoning. <br /> In November 2004, Planning Committee Chair Elarionoff introduced revised General Plan Draft 2 <br /> ("GPD2", attached elar d2 resp.pdf; REPORTCOUNTYOFHAWAII.doc) which returned the resort node <br /> on DLNR land at Honokohau. <br /> <br /> The County Council Planning Committee is unable to pass GPD2 before they are removed from office <br /> in December 2004. <br /> <br /> In January 2005, the current County Council passed GPD1 with the DLNR land designated as Open. <br /> <br /> In September 2005, at a BLNR meeting regarding the proposed JDI development, Kona elected <br /> representatives Councilman Angel Pilago, Councilwoman Virginia Isbell, and State Rep. Cindi Evans all <br /> requested that the development agreement decision be delayed until public hearings can be held in <br /> Kona. <br /> In November 2005, the BLNR and JDI entered into the Agreement, a contract. However, HRS 171-60 <br /> (C) (attached HRS171honokohau.doc) states, "Prior to leasing any public land to, or entering into a <br /> development contract with, a developer or developers, the board shall determine the use or uses to <br /> which the lands shall be put, which shall be in conformity with the applicable state, city and county, or <br /> county zoning and subdivision laws, ordinances, or regulations...". <br /> <br /> GPD1, containing the Open designation for DLNR lands adjoining Honokohau, had been public for two <br /> years before the DLNR issued its RFQ/RFP. <br /> It is obvious from this timeline and events above that BLNR, JDI, and certain County officials had <br /> constructive knowledge that: <br /> <br /> 1) existing Open County zoning and GPD1 designation were in conflict with the Honokohau <br /> RFQ/RFP when issued. <br /> <br /> 2) the Agreement was in conflict with existing Open County zoning and the adopted General Plan <br /> Open designation. <br /> <br /> 3) the Agreement was in conflict with 171-60(C). <br /> <br /> Therefore, the Agreement is void under existing state law. Kona Marina has no "entitlements" to the <br /> public's land at Honokohau. <br /> Supporters of Jacoby that the Kona Kai Ola project, which also proposes to develop 200 acres of <br /> Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, land, will provide substantial revenue to DHHL for building <br /> homes for Native Hawaiians. But the DHHL lease provides payments of only $16.3 million over 20 <br /> years. These payments have been weighted to favor the developer by requiring small initial payments, <br /> which will delay revenues for DHHL home construction. <br /> <br /> The current project proposal will only provide DHHL with one-time payments of I% of the sales price of <br /> each timeshare or less than $10 million. <br /> <br /> The construction of perhaps 100 homes over 20 years worth is not worth losing 200 acres of DHHL <br /> land. <br /> <br /> <br /> 8/1/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.