My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0999.001 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0999.001 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2008 11:16:41 PM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:05:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0999
Point
001
Author
Bob Hunter
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC - 8/21/06
Document Relationships
AGE PC 08/21/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 318 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
BIL 319 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0999.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The drafts include a waiver from the requirement for affordable housing and workforce <br /> housing developments. It allows developments serving households malting no more than <br /> <br /> some portion of the median household income off the hook- While only 100 percent <br /> affordable developments and a cutoff of 120 percent of the median household income are <br /> proposed, the council could decide that other percentages are appropriate. <br /> <br /> <br /> Notice that the concurrency requirement does not apply at time of building permit, so <br /> <br /> there is no need to waive it for first-time home buyers or owner-builders or anyone else <br /> who wants to build on an existing lot. Building on the 60,000+ existing lots in the county <br /> <br /> would not be affected. The concurrency requirement does not apply to building on those <br /> existing lots, only to lots that are created after the effective date of the ordinances. <br /> <br /> <br /> In summary, the idea is to get the county or the developer or both of them to commit to at <br /> least having a funded plan for providing the infrastructure improvements needed to <br /> <br /> accommodate the approved development that is on the books each time more <br /> development is approved. For those of you who believe that "money is not the problem" <br /> <br /> in infrastructure funding for our island, here is a chance to take a "show me the money" <br /> approach. <br /> <br /> <br /> If adopted, the ordinances could have the effect of focusing (prioritizing) infrastructure <br /> capacity improvement in areas that will need it as then-approved subdivisions are built <br /> <br /> out (that means the areas that are rapidly growing right now). Development would also <br /> be encouraged to happen in areas that already have adequate infrastructure or where <br /> additional infrastructure can be provided at least cost, encouraging economic efficiency. <br /> <br /> For example, development near jobs would be encouraged because less commuting <br /> would be necessary (and less new road capacity would have to be funded). <br /> <br /> <br /> Only if neither our county government nor developers were willing to fund the <br /> <br /> infrastructure needed to prevent our levels of water supply and transportation service <br /> from becoming (or continuing to be) unacceptable would a temporary growth moratorium <br /> <br /> <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.