My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1033.002 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 1033.002 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2008 10:35:29 PM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:07:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
1033
Point
002
Author
Charles Flaherty
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC - 9/19/06
Document Relationships
AGE PC 09/19/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 328 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 1033.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br /> C <br /> Director were to change their determination, for whatever reason. Levels of service must be established <br /> through the legislative branch, not the administrative branch. <br /> <br /> "Concurrency Management." (2) and (3): This language creates a loophole that makes it possible for <br /> new development phases to be approved prior to construction if required capital improvements are <br /> financially secured by an acceptable surety. For instance, Hokuli'a Phase 1 was approved in 1999 <br /> upon the Mamalahoa Bypass Highway being financially secured. Phase 2 was approved in 2000, even <br /> though construction of the Bypass had not begun. The current Planning Director gave Phase 3 tentative <br /> approval in 2002, while construction of Phase 1 of the Bypass had only begun. Seven years after it was <br /> financially secured, the Bypass Highway has yet to be completed. Lesson: Build the capital <br /> improvement, THEN give approval to new development phase. (4) Legislation must set level of service <br /> standard and objective methods of determination in order to remove discretion. <br /> <br /> "Public Facilites Improvement Plan." Public facilities improvement plan should become ordinance in <br /> order to make concurrency ordinance legally defensible through argument of reasonable effort. <br /> Mahalo, <br /> Charles Flaherty <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 9/19/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.