Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> TESTIMONY - COUNTY COUNCIL - Resolution 449-06 (Communication 1056) - <br /> Public Access Pedestrian Easements from Kailua Kona Village Development, LLC <br /> <br /> Prepared by: <br /> <br /> Robert Ward <br /> Kailua Kona <br /> <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to share my concerns. I have been a <br /> supporter of this pedestrian access even before the Declarant applied for the <br /> Special Management Area (SMA) Permit. I still welcome the access but believe <br /> that some changes are warranted to improve the accessibility and better utilize <br /> the easement. <br /> <br /> <br /> 1. The SMA permit requires access along the mauka side of the seawall. <br /> The legal description appears to place it along the makai side of the <br /> wall. The makai location encompasses a deteriorating walking surface <br /> and does not provide appropriate barriers or railings required by Code. <br /> The legal description should be adjusted to place the lateral access <br /> mauka of the seawall. <br /> <br /> <br /> 2. The vertical alignment presents some unique barriers to the mobility <br /> impaired. The stipulations under 28CFR part 36 provide standards for <br /> accessibility under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). <br /> Requirements such as ramps may require a wider easement to <br /> construct them and provide the necessary railings. The easement <br /> should be adjusted to provide an additional 2 feet (or more) so that a <br /> clear 10 feet will be provided for pedestrian use. <br /> <br /> <br /> 3. The intent of the SMA permit was to provide a 10-foot wide pedestrian <br /> way. This is slightly different then a simply providing a 10-foot wide <br /> easement. When the pathway turns, pedestrians do not follow the sharp <br /> angles. They tend to follow a meandering path with soft curves rather <br /> than abrupt changes in direction like a marching band. While there are <br /> guidelines and standards for streets, bikeways and multi-use paths, <br /> neither the Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) nor The American <br /> Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) <br /> provide specifics on curves for pedestrian-only use. Using 10-foot radii <br /> for the inside curves and 20-foot radii for the external curve boundaries <br /> is reasonable. The easement should be adjusted to provide a minimum <br /> internal radius of 10-feet and minimum external radius of 20-feet so that <br /> a clear 10 feet will be provided for pedestrian use. <br />