Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> For a long time, HSF officials, with the concurrence of the State Department of <br /> Transportation, have argued that there would be no adverse impact on traffic. Recently, <br /> HSF revised its schedule so that they will depart from Kawaihae at mid-day rather than <br /> 9:00 p.m. HSF and DOT officials now claim that the change was made to reduce the <br /> impact on local traffic. Interesting. First we're told there will be no impact on traffic, and <br /> then we're told that the schedule change was made to avoid compounding our traffic <br /> problems. They can't have it both ways. More likely, HSF made a business decision <br /> when they realized that a 9:00 p.m. departure from Kawaihae with a 1:00 a.m. arrival in <br /> Honolulu might not be popular, and, having made a that business decision, they took the <br /> opportunity to put some spin on it by claiming that the decision was driven by concern <br /> for local traffic. <br /> At a recent community meeting in Waimea, we saw a computerized simulation of traffic <br /> in Waimea that allowed planners to demonstrate the effects on traffic backups of various <br /> modifications to roads and traffic lights. Why not a similar study at Kawaihae? At a <br /> recent meeting at Kealakehe High School, Harbors Director Barry Fukunaga, in response <br /> to a question, repeated his frequent assertion that no traffic study was needed. Later in the <br /> meeting, Director of Transportation Rod Hiraga mentioned that HSF had prepared a <br /> traffic plan that DOT sent back for revisions. Which is it? No plan necessary or a plan <br /> that was deemed deficient? Does the public get to see these plans? Apparently not. <br /> <br /> Whales <br /> I have spent time on the water in the Kawaihae area during whale season on fishing <br /> boats, kayaks, and outrigger canoes, and I have had very close and unexpected encounters <br /> with whales on all three. Based on my experience, I can say that HSF's claim that they <br /> will avoid whales by slowing down to 25 knots is nonsense. In very calm waters while <br /> traveling at trolling speed (8 knots), when whale sighting should be easiest, I have had <br /> encounters with whales that required immediate and abrupt evasive action. In one case, <br /> the captain of a 35 foot fishing boat and two others were paying special attention to <br /> watching for whales when one suddenly surfaced directly in front of us. The captain <br /> slammed the boat into reverse and we shuddered to a stop less than 20 feet from the <br /> whale, which floated directly in front of us for a few moments before slowly swimming <br /> off. To claim that a vessel ten times as long as our fishing boat, traveling at three times <br /> our speed could have evaded that whale displays a lack of appreciation of the density of <br /> the whale population during winter months. <br /> Resource depletion <br /> The impact of Oahu fishermen on local fishery resources is a concern to local residents, <br /> and this concern has been echoed by Dr. Bill Walsh of DLNR. At a public information <br /> meeting, this concern was been dismissed by Harbors Director Barry Fukunaga, who says <br /> that he believes that just as many Big Island fishermen will travel to Oahu as will travel <br /> to the Big Island. By itself, the difference in population between the two islands renders <br /> his statement absurd. To compare the over-fished waters of Oahu with the offshore <br /> fishing of the Kona Coast and the ulua fishing of South Point is a display of ignorance. <br /> Mr. Fukunaga's assertion that all Hawai'i residents should have equal opportunity to fish <br /> where they please misses the point-that preservation of threatened resources is very <br /> <br /> 2 <br />