COM 0564.002 1996-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

3. Defendant County of Hawaii is a political subdivision of the State of Hawaii, It is a body politic, with ilis own charter and ordinances; its main business offices are loca- ted in Hilo Hawaii, where the main police station and prosecutor's office are also located. 4. Defendant Stephen K. Yamashiro was and is at all times relevant herein the duly elected Mayor of the County of Hawaii. He is sued herein as an individual and in his official capacity as Mayor of the County of Hawaii. 5. Defendant ~?Vayne G. Carvalho was and is at all times relevant herein Chief of Police of the County oi` Hawaii. He was appointed by the County Police Commission. He is sued herein as an individual and in his official capacity as Chief of Police. 6. The above named defendants Henry W. Hickman, J. Kealoha, Steven S. Clark, Alan M. Kimura and Joseph T. Lally are all members of the Hawaii County police force as "sworn individuals" and were on 14 September 1995 when the events complained of herein started employed as such in the Kamuela, Honokaa or North and South Hilo police stations. They are sued herein as individuals and in their official capacities as members of the county police force. 7. Defendant Jay Kimura was and is during all times relevant herein the elected County of Hawaii Prosecuting Attorney. He is sued herein as an individual and in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney. 8. Defendants William Smith and Janet Garcia are deputy county prosecutors who are employed by Defendant Jay Kimura at his pleasure. They are sued as individu- als and in their official capacities as deputy prosecutors. They were stationed in the Hilo office while Garcia also had a satellite office in Kamuela at the relevant time herein. 9. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise of the above captioned "DOE" Defendants are at this time unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues said defendants, for amounts due under the claims, by these ficti- tious names and will ask leave of court to amend this complaint and substitute the true names and capacities when same become known. Due and.diligent search was done by Plaintiff to ascertain the names and identities and parts thereof of these unnamed defen- dants including the examination of reports, documents and records, as they pertain to the alleged actions complained of herein.