COM 0564.002 1996-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

after the other in each other's presence as thev did. neither for not declaring the arrest with reasons or charge and not orouerly identifvino themselves• and thus violated their oath of office: Sections 803-1. 5. and 6 HRS. GO 606-II. III V VI VII IX. X. XI: the Hawaii Constitution Art. 1 Section 5.6 and 7 and corresoondina articles of the U.S. Constitution: Section 1983 of Chanter 42 of the United States Code (USC1. Lally and Kimura further also violated GO 300-N. V. VI. VII and VIII GO 603-II. III. V and VI. GO 605-III. IV. V. VI. VII and VIII. GO 804-III and N: GO 300A-IV• and thev also violated HRS 707-710 and/or 707-711and/or 707-712.707-713 and/or 707-714.707-721and/or 707-722. 707-732 and/or 70733: and finally Kimura violated GO 802-III. COUNT 3. BEASTLY TRANSPORTATION BACK TO KAMUELA 24. Ross was then pushed and shoved into the front passenger seat of a mini- compact (that does not qualify for use by police) on top of a lot rubbish lying on the seat, hard and protruding metal things that he could not see (a clipboard etc.), with handcuffs behind his back while having severe osteo-arthritis in all joints, worst in the knees, bursi- tis and tendonitis in all extremities so bad that he cannot even shake hands, a dislocated fused disk in his back and two such disks in his neck, which limit his normal motions. The front seat of Kimura's mini-car was all the way upfront because of his short legs. Ross asked to push it backward because even without being shackled he could not have sat there. It was refused so his head kept bouncing against the driver's headrest with the car in motion, his feet were tight against the door while his shins were being severely bruised against the glove compartment and his left shoulder was jerked against the back of the seat, pulling through the handcuffs on his right shoulder. Then a seatbelt was strung over him and tightened, that would have lead to certain death in case of any acci- dent with handcuffed hands behind his back. This was reckless endangering, because, aside from the immediate pain suffered, in case of any accident Ross would have been unable to free himself from the wrecked or burning car. It was also reckless driving. Upon a second feeble complaint about that transportation Kimura asked Plaintiff angrily what he at the time, dazed as he was, understood as: "would you rather have a `black 7