Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> park (which would have the effect of enhancing the value of her property). Ms. Kosada has <br /> also circulated a petition which sensationalizes and completely misrepresents the facts. The <br /> RA-2a zoning, which Captain Cook Ranch LLC has taken great effort to preserve, does not <br /> allow commercial activity and has a height limitation of thirty five feet. <br /> <br /> 5) Consistency, with State Land Use State Law County General Plan and County Zoning: <br /> <br /> a) Such Rural Designation is consistent with the State Land Use Urban District and the <br /> Residential-Agricultural two (2) acre zoning. <br /> <br /> b) The General Plan Text specifically encourages "Rural-style residential-agricultural <br /> developments......... in close proximity to centers of employment, shopping and other <br /> conveniences and have the basic improvements and amenities necessary for <br /> development." This is just such an area, as it is directly makai of Captain Cook. <br /> c) HRS, Section 205-G [states that] Each County shall identify and map potential <br /> important agricultural lands within its jurisdiction based on standards and criteria in <br /> section 205-D and the intent of this part, except lands that have been designated through <br /> the State Land Use, Zoning, or county planning process, for Urban use by the County or <br /> State. <br /> <br /> 6) Reliance, Fairness and Vesting: <br /> <br /> a) The historical use of this property has been ranching for the past 150 years. Property <br /> taxes have been assessed and paid on the basis of its SLU "Urban" designation and <br /> zoning rather than at agricultural rates. This has resulted in hundreds of thousands of <br /> dollars in extra tax revenue to the County over the years. It would be unfair for the <br /> County to now deny a designation consistent with the basis on which taxes have been <br /> paid and upon which the owners have relied. <br /> b) We believe that our substantial expenditures, including contribution of $161,250 paid <br /> directly to the County of Hawaii for improvements to the intersection of Napo'opo'o <br /> Road and the Mamalahoa Highway [never completed], as well as our reliance on <br /> assurances by County officials, clearly and completely fulfill the Hawaii Supreme <br /> Court's criteria for the vesting of our entitlements, and that such vested rights are now <br /> constitutionally protected. <br /> <br /> 7) Environmental Matters: <br /> <br /> a) We anticipate the imposition of the requirement by the State Department of Health <br /> (DOH) that individual septic tanks be required on each of the proposed two acre lots for <br /> the proposed 33 lot subdivision. In the future even better waste disposal technology may <br /> become available. <br /> b) Our project engineer Nancy Burns P.E. will design and oversee any improvements to <br /> fully comply with all Federal, State and County requirements. It should be clearly <br /> understood that there is no one living makai of this area, so there is no drainage impact <br /> on any person below. <br />