My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0964.057 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0964.057 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 12:47:07 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:10:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0964
Point
057
Author
Dore Dokos-Leowenthal
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 11/29/06 Council: Postponed to 11/29/06 Council Meeting - 11/15/06 Presented: Council - 9/7/06
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 11/15/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
AGE COUNCIL 11/29/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
BIL 309 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0964.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> page 3 <br /> The F-2 amendment would greatly raise the land value for one particular entity, Captain <br /> Cook LLC; remove important agricultural land from the Kona Coffee Belt; and provide <br /> Captain Crook, LLC with entitlements that could not be rescinded if the F-2 amendment is <br /> passed. 'therefore, the issue of the F'-2 amendment is one that should not be railroaded <br /> through the County Council. I think it is fair to say that this F-2 issue is the canary in the <br /> mine shaft in terms of public perception. With the Kona Community Development Plan <br /> in process of being drafted, many citizens are aware of land use issues. Since it is an <br /> election year, there is even more scrutiny of how our officials are dealing with these <br /> issues. <br /> <br /> Amendment F-2 is an issue that requires accountability. It requires the will to take a <br /> stand to protect Kealakekua Bay and the agrarian lands of the Pali. What you do with <br /> amendment F-2 and your vote will set the future course for these lands, the coral reefs <br /> and the tropical fish ecosystems of Kealakekua Bay. <br /> <br /> Please remember, this a fragile, irreplaceable area beloved by island residents who have <br /> expressed their deep concern over passing amendment F-2, <br /> <br /> PART TWO <br /> <br /> PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> CONCERNS, RISKS AND REGULATIONS <br /> Throughout the testimony submitted opposing General <br /> <br /> Interim Amendment F-2, information has been entered on <br /> record to make sure the Hawaii County Planning Commission, <br /> Planning Director and members of the County Council are <br /> <br /> aware of current criteria, standards and regulations for <br /> protecting our coastal resources. <br /> <br /> <br /> Hawaii County has not been notably diligent or effective in <br /> implementing proactive comprehensive programs to protect <br /> our island's coastal ecosystems. The County has not been <br /> <br /> diligent or effective in enforcing Federal, State and Hawaii <br /> County General Plan regulations and mandates for <br /> environmental protection. Many other Counties and States <br /> <br /> have been far more stringent in enforcing requirements and <br /> standards to meet the Federal Clean Water Act. Many other <br /> Counties and States have initiated ordinance and research <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.