My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0798.016 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0798.016 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 7:22:46 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:10:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0798
Point
016
Author
Lawrence K. Mahuna, Police Chief
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Document Relationships
BIL 258 Draft 03 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0798.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> SUBJECT : ANIMAL CONTROL BILL, BILL 258 (DRAFT 3) <br /> (WRITTEN TESTIMONY ONLY) <br /> PAGE2 <br /> <br /> <br /> 2. According to Sections 4-13 and 4-28 of Bill 258 fines and forfeitures collected shall be paid <br /> into the County treasury and deposited in the general fund of the County. However, the <br /> proceedings that give rise to the fines and forfeitures fall within the jurisdiction of the State <br /> of Hawai'i court system. <br /> <br /> Specifically, according to Sections 4-9 and 4-11 of Bill 258, complaints and summons for <br /> violations of the animal control laws are filed in the district courts, with the payment of fines <br /> via mail sent to the district courts. These are two different governmental entities. <br /> <br /> Currently, it is our understanding that fines go to the State of Hawaii, via the judiciary. <br /> This inconsistency of "who gets the money and where it goes" needs to be addressed before <br /> this Bill can pass final reading. <br /> 3. According to Section 4-17 of Bill 258 license fees are to be deposited into the Spay/Neuter <br /> Fund. Section 4-17 of Bill 258 is unworkable since it is our understanding that the County <br /> of Hawaii currently does not have a Spay/Neuter Fund because such a fund was never <br /> created. This issue needs to be addressed before this Bill can pass final reading. <br /> <br /> 4. Sections 4-5 and 4-6 of Bill 258 sets forth what would be considered "animal nuisance." <br /> Within sections 4-5 and 4-6 of Bill 258, it appears that defecation has been <br /> excluded/omitted. The reference to Hawaii Revised Statutes section 322-2, that states that a <br /> "source of filth, or cause of sickness or disease is found on private property" may imply that <br /> defecation should be considered animal nuisance. However, such implication is vague. <br /> <br /> Within the current Hawaii County Code, Section 4-19, defecation is specifically and <br /> effectively addressed. <br /> <br /> Is the Council choosing to remove defecation from the definition of animal nuisance or was <br /> that just an accidental omission? If it was an accidental omission, then perhaps the language <br /> from the existing Section 4-19 should be incorporated to the proposed revision. This issue <br /> needs to be addressed before this Bill can pass final reading. <br /> <br /> 5. According to Section 4-18 of Bill 258, "the impoundment of unlicensed dogs shall be as <br /> provided in section 143-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes." Presently, the Hawaii Revised <br /> Statutes sets the impoundment fee at $2.50/day, unless another fee amount is provided by <br /> ordinance. Bill 258 does not have any impoundment fee/rate schedule, therefore <br /> establishing the impoundment fee at $2.50/day. If the impoundment fee is set at $2.50/day, <br /> that fee would be less than the impoundment fee currently collected. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.