My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0964.140 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0964.140 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 12:44:53 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:11:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0964
Point
140
Author
Dore Dokos-Loewenthal
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 11/29/06
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 11/29/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
BIL 309 Draft 04 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0964.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Nov 15 06 12:06p M&D LOEWEMTHAL 808-323-3282 p.2 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> PAGE 2 of 4 - BILL 309 TESTIMONY NOV. 15, 2006 <br /> <br /> Rather, in his testimony, Mr. Gibson said they "anticipate the imposition of the <br /> requirement by the DOH that individual septic tanks be required..." <br /> <br /> <br /> Addendum B is the Request for Information from DOH , dated Nov. 13, 2006, <br /> stating that CESSPOOLS ARE ALLOWABLE on TMK 8-2-2-2 and 8-2-2-55. <br /> These two TMK parcels comprise the nearly 100 acres owned by Captain Cook <br /> Ranch,LLC, affected by F-2. <br /> <br /> Mr. Gibson is "anticipating" something from DOH that is not going to come. <br /> <br /> Captain Cook Ranch, LLC, has Tim Lui-Kwan, an attorney for Carlsmith- Ball, listed as <br /> "applicant". It has attorney Michael Gibson as "manager". It is owned By Christopher <br /> Nome, who was a practicing attorney. <br /> Does this Council think it likely that I know more about their property than three <br /> attorneys do, simply because I requested information of public record? <br /> <br /> <br /> FAILURE TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT <br /> Why is this County Council accepting such questionable testimony without seriously <br /> examining environmental concerns? Why is this County Council going ahead on <br /> important land use decisions without applying strict comprehensive standards for <br /> environmental protection? <br /> <br /> Hawaii County is now legally liable for adverse impact and degradation of our coastal <br /> waters. Land-based pollution degrades coastal waters. Land use decisions determine land- <br /> based pollution. How can sound land use decisions be made without utilizing updated <br /> environmental knowledge and strict protection standards? <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Dore Dokos-Loewenthal <br /> November 14, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.