My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP HSEDC 006 10/17/2006 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2004-2006
>
Human Services & Economic Development Committee (HSEDC)
>
REP HSEDC 006 10/17/2006 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 10:43:39 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:11:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2004-2006
Report
006
Committee
HSEDC
Meeting date
2006-10-17
Document Relationships
COM 1026.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 1026.000 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
RES 432 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2004-2006
RES 432 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> The testifier that did not support Resolution 432-06 outright, did have general concerns <br /> about the Superferry, but did not specifically speak on the resolution before the council. <br /> One testifier suggested an amendment to the resolution that would create a clause to <br /> consider the impacts the Superferry would have on the cultural resources of Hawaii <br /> Island. These "cultural resources" included Opihi, Limu, A`ama crabs and other mazine <br /> resources deemed vital to this State. This suggestion was taken favorably by the author of <br /> Resolution 432-06. Draft 2 of Resolution 432-06 will be introduced to Council with this <br /> provision included. <br /> Overall, when including the amendment suggested for Resolution 432-06, Resolution <br /> 432-06 received positive feedback and support from your committee. <br /> The lone dissenting vote was cast based on concern that the call for an EIS will send a <br /> negative message to Superferry and its supporters, thus dealing a blow to the overall <br /> process. <br /> There was also some concern that, though Resolution 432-06 is well intended and <br /> prudent by nature, it may not be effective to the point that an EIS will be performed. The <br /> author of Resolution 432-06 responded to this concern by stating that it was incumbent <br /> upon all those that had worked so hard thus far to ensure an EIS would be performed to <br /> keep the pressure up and maintain an organized effort. <br /> One Council Member casting a favorable vote did express an overall disdain for the <br /> Superferry in general. This disfavor emanates from concerns that the Island is not in a <br /> position to handle the inevitable impacts that the Superferry will create, with traffic issues <br /> being the predominant concern. This Council Member stated that the EIS will bring these <br /> problems to light, which will produce the ultimate desired result - no Superferry. <br /> Your Committee on Human Services and Economic Development is in accord with the <br /> purpose and intent of Resolution No. 432-06, and recommends its adoption. Resolution <br /> 432-06 will be forwarded to Council in Draft 2 form, with considerations for impacts to <br /> "cultural resources" as the only alteration made to the original draft. <br /> Jdh <br /> Ayes noes A&e ex Respectfully submitted <br /> ARAKAKI X <br /> HICA x COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES <br /> xoFFN1ANN x AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br /> HOLSCHUH X <br /> IKEDA X <br /> ISBELL X <br /> aACOSSOn X FRED C. HOLSCHUH, M.D., CHAIR <br /> PILAGO X HSEDC REPORT NO. 6 <br /> SAFARIK X ADOPTED: OCT 3 T 2006 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.