REP PC 110 09/19/2006 2004-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PLANNING DATE: September 19, 2006 Re: Comm. No. 1005Bi11 No. 322 PLACE: Sheraton Keauhou Bay Resort & Spa TIME: 2:30 p.m. Council Chair and Members Hawaii County Council Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Your Committee on Planning, to which was referred Bill No. 322, reports as follows: Bill No. 322, transmitted via Communication No. 1005 from Mayor Harry Kim, dated August 2, 2006, proposes amendments to conditions of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 90-010 by Samson LLC. Bill No. 322 seeks to amend conditions of Ordinance No. 90-010, which rezoned approximately 45,411 square feet of land from a Multiple Family Residential - 2,000 square feet (RM-2) to a Village Commercial - 7,500 square feet (CV-7.5) district, at Hienaloli 5~' and 6w, North Kona, Hawaii. Communication No. 1005 reports that the Hawaii County Planning Commission, as required by Chapter 4, Sec. 6-4.3(C), Hawaii County Charter, considered the above request on July 21, 2006. The Commission concurred with the Planning Director's reasons for recommending favorable consideration of this request. Communication No. 1005 transmits the following findings and recommendations: 1. The area involved is located along~the north side of Hualalai Road, adjacent to the Aloha Kona Subdivision at Hienaloli 4`~ and 5 ,District of North Kona, Hawaii. 2. Applicant is requesting a time extension to Condition B (Final Plan Approval) and Condition C (Commence Construction) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 90-010. Applicant purchased the property from the original landowners in Febnaary 2005 and is requesting additional time to comply with the conditions of approval. 3. Ordinance No. 86-49, approved on June 2, 1986, amended the district classification from Multiple-Family Residential (RM-2) to Village Commercial (CV-7.5) to allow construction of a two-story, 15,530-square foot office building and an existing multiple-family structure proposed for conversion into an office building. 4. On June 7, 1989, a request was made to delete Condition B (Plan Approval), Condition C (Construction timetable) and Condition G (administrative time extension) of Ordinance No. 86- 49. 5. On November 7, 1989, the Planning Commission denied a request to delete Conditions B, C and G of Ordinance No. 86-49 and additional conditions were included to accommodate the change of ownership and revised project plans. 6. On February 13, 1990, Ordinance No. 90-010 became effective and amended various conditions in Ordinance No. 86-49. PC Report No. 110