Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> -2- <br /> <br /> It is my understanding that county planner is not in favor of this mauka road idea, because <br /> the "mid-level road" was a condition of the PUD that allowed MG to be developed. There <br /> are, in fact, exceptions to changing the access roads that were required by a PUD, one being <br /> the Alii Heights Development, which required an access road onto Kuakini Hwy a site which <br /> was found to be unsafe. Because of the safety issues the road could not be dedicated. The <br /> decision was apparently made that this PUD road access was never to be enforced. We <br /> would also like to have the County Council make a re judgment regarding our "connectivity" <br /> road. <br /> <br /> So it comes down to pleading to the counsel members to deny the zoning application <br /> for this property until Mr. Carr can show the council members and the planning <br /> department that he has secured, in contract, the right-of-ways for the water and the <br /> roadway rights. That he has meet with the majority of developments neighbors to <br /> have a constructive dialog to hear there concerns and tell these concerned neighbors <br /> what he can provide to minimize the impact of his development. If requested The MG <br /> Home Owners Association will provide a updated mailing list for it residents.' <br /> Additionally that "Road H", through MG never be used as egress for the <br /> development/construction of KCE, if the project gains approval. <br /> jtespectfully yours, <br /> <br /> i~ <br /> Michael L. Flaherty <br />