My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0766.058 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0766.058 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 8:36:01 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:12:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0766
Point
058
Author
Adele DeCuyper
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 11/09/06
Document Relationships
BIL 251 Draft 02 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0766.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> SOLUTION: <br /> <br /> Lowe's has no problem right now with one ingress/egress through Henry Street. hi fact, <br /> in Lowe's Deed it states that they will have one ingress/ egress through Henry Street. <br /> My suggestion is to CLOSE the road by ordinance from the edge of Lowe's property that <br /> would only allow traffic from Kona Coffee Estates, Kanuhas and Malulani Gardens to <br /> access the QKH from Malulani Drive. That I believe was the original plan. <br /> In the past we have also suggested widening the road by incorporating the park and <br /> creating roundabouts (traffic circles) there are no signal lights needed in this design. <br /> These ideas were rejected. <br /> <br /> ISSUE 2. ROAD H <br /> <br /> When Malulani Gardens was going through the permit process in 1999 the Planning <br /> Department in phase two requested that "the internal roadway system for the subdivision <br /> should be designed to interconnect with adjacent developments to localize their internal <br /> traffic movements" As of now there are no developments on either side to connect to. Mr. <br /> Carr had made the suggestion that that road could be used as his "second access" road <br /> and a construction route. If used as a construction route how would Stanford Carr prevent <br /> his construction traffic from taking a short cut through Malulani Gardens private road? <br /> <br /> This proposal doesn't make any sense at all. Carr's development is 108 acres, Malulani <br /> Gardens is 23 acres. Granted that it is low density, I believe that he still needs an access <br /> road further up the subdivision not at the mid level road crossing Malulani Gardens that <br /> will divide and compromise our gated community <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> SOLUTION: A <br /> <br /> I don't think we should have to defend the use of this road. It is clearly stated in the PUD <br /> what the future use is for. <br /> <br /> SOLUTION: B <br /> <br /> Move the middle level road to the mauka end of the Malulani Gardens subdivision. Brian <br /> Cook the developer of Malulani Gardens has a one-acre parcel that could be purchased by <br /> Stanford Carr. I believe this could solve many problems, access, and water and future <br /> connectivity as desired by the planning department. This would also prevent division of <br /> our community <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.