My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0762.054 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0762.054 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 9:11:28 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:12:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0762
Point
054
Author
Alan Dickler
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 5/02/06
Document Relationships
BIL 246 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0762.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Page 1 of 1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Murashige, Laura <br /> <br /> From: Alan Dickler [alan@westprodev.comj <br /> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 10:21 AM <br /> <br /> To: Higa, Stacy; visabell@co.hawaii.hi.us; Holschuh, Fred; Ikeda, Donald; Arakaki, James; 'us"; <br /> Jacobson, Bob; Pilago, K. Angel; Hoffmann, Pete <br /> Cc: cohmayor@co.hawaii.hi.us; plan ning@co.hawai i. hi. us <br /> Subject: Bill 246 <br /> <br /> Councilmen and Councilwoman, <br /> Please accept this email as testimony in support of Bill 246 amending the Subdivision Code. The present process <br /> is fair and responsible. The Planning Department has not abused the authority it has assumed. Requiring the <br /> amount of information that is represented by the present letter of the law would not enhance the decision making <br /> ability of the Planning Department or the Council, but will require vast amounts of additional money spent by <br /> Developers upfront before the actual public input is received. This would actually have the opposite effect the <br /> opponents of this measure intend by causing Developers to be more heavily invested, both economically and <br /> emotionally in the plans presented prior to input both from the County agencies and the public. This new <br /> interpretation would also specifically have a negative impact on all but the very largest developers since the <br /> upfront costs could far out way their ability to obtain financing for the 'soft costs' required under the new <br /> interpretation. <br /> I urge the Council to support Bill 246. <br /> Mahalo for your consideration. <br /> Respectfully <br /> Alan Dickler <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> comm t4 62•• <br /> Ref. To: Prey <br /> Ref. Date VW 0 2202 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 5/1/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.