My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0766.034 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0766.034 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 8:38:18 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:12:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0766
Point
034
Author
Dore Dokos-Loewenthal
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 11/15/06
Document Relationships
BIL 251 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
BIL 309 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0766.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Page 1 of 2 <br /> rY <br /> <br /> <br /> Murashige, Laura <br /> <br /> From: rivaut@netscape.com <br /> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 9:42 AM <br /> To: counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us, Pilago, K. Angel <br /> ~s <br /> Subject: Fwd: Testimony BILL 251 agendizing issue <br /> 11 u~ <br /> c_ <br /> Begin forwarded message: ' <br /> <br /> From: <rivaut@netscape.com> <br /> To: Me <rivaut@netscape.com> co <br /> Subject: Testimony BILL 251 agendizing issue <br /> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:39:39 -0800 J <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> November 14, 2006 <br /> <br /> To Chairman Higa and County Council <br /> <br /> Dear County Council, <br /> The issue has been raised whether a bill can be agendized and noticed for a reading before the County <br /> Council has met an agreed-upon pre-condition, (public hearing). <br /> <br /> While the public hearings may have been scheduled at the time the bills were agendized and noticed, the <br /> pre-condition for further deliberation and decision had not yet been met. <br /> The question is whether Bill 251 and Bill 309 are legally on the Nov. 15 agenda. <br /> <br /> Has this matter been resolved without doubt? It should not be presented to the public as legal unless it <br /> absolutely is legal. <br /> <br /> Certainly, it would be unseemly to proceed with haste on these two Bills which affect so many citizens, <br /> and find out later that procedure was incorrect. The rights of citizens would not be well-served. Liability <br /> suits impacting the landowners' and developers' interests could also arise if decisions were made <br /> following improper protocol. <br /> <br /> Therefore, I am entering this testimony that citizens expect that the County Council will be in total <br /> compliance with legally proscribed information practices regarding the above issue in relation to Bills <br /> 251 and 309. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> <br /> Dore Dokos-Loewenthal <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Comm. No. WO 2 _F <br /> Ref. To: tf 6 <br /> Ref. Date <br /> 11/15/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.