Laserfiche WebLink
J <br /> are graphically shown on Figure 3. An additional five vph from each direction were <br /> added to the opposing traffic flow (i.e., leaving in the first hour and entering in the <br /> second hour) to account for drop offs and pick ups, respectively. <br /> The project generated trips from Figure 3 were added to the ambient traffic <br /> <br /> forecast volumes to obtain the total traffic forecast with project volumes shown on <br /> Figure 3. <br /> If the church facility is not developed and 10 homes are built instead, the major <br /> <br /> trip generation times would be during the weekday morning and afternoon peak <br /> periods. However, based on trip generation rates from the previously referenced ITE <br /> handbook, 10 homes can be expected to generate seven total (inbound and outbound) <br /> <br /> trips in the morning peak and 10 total trips in the afternoon peak. These volumes of <br /> <br /> trips are not significant and are not expected to have any adverse impact on traffic <br /> operations on Palani Road. Therefore, a formal analysis of the 10 homes was not <br /> conducted. <br /> <br /> TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS <br /> Two distinct level of service methodologies from the Transportation Research <br /> Board 1994 Highway Caoacitv Manual Uodate were utilized to calculate levels of <br /> service. The first methodology calculated levels of service at the unsignalized <br /> intersection of the project access road with Palani Road. The second methodology <br /> calculated levels of service for Palani Road serving as a rural two lane highway. <br /> The methodology for calculating levels of service at unsignalized intersections <br /> does it for several critical movements (the outbound movements from the stop sign <br /> controlled side street and the left turn movements from the main through street) based <br /> a. <br /> <br />