Laserfiche WebLink
Takashi Domingo , <br /> Page 3 <br /> November 13, 1996 <br /> not specify the type fence to be constructed and that <br /> we had determined that the developer has complied with <br /> Condition I of the subject ordinance. <br /> 7. At the October 31, 1996 field inspection, staff <br /> observed that the existing fence consists of hogwire <br /> and a strand of barbwire at the top portion of the <br /> fence. The height of the existing fence varies from 4 <br /> feet to 5 1/2 feet while the fence posts are 6 foot <br /> high. The fence has been installed along the eastern <br /> boundary and extends from an existing 6-foot high chain <br /> link fence (situated on the original commercial zoned <br /> area) to the end of the developed area covered by the <br /> subject ordinance. <br /> 8. Several ti corn plants have been planted along the <br /> fence adjacent to the three existing parking areas. <br /> Two of the parking areas are situated on the original <br /> commercial zoned area and one on the area covered by <br /> the subject ordinance. <br /> 9. A few scattered rubbish and food wrappers were observed <br /> along the existing chain link and hogwire/barbwire <br /> fence and within the abutting property. However, that <br /> debris were located near a corner between the two <br /> existing parking areas on the original commercial zoned <br /> area and not the area covered by the subject ordinance. <br /> According to Mr. Bill Gellman, representing the <br /> developer, a maintenance person has been hired to <br /> maintain the area. <br /> Based on the foregoing, we feel that the type and height of the <br /> existing fence is sufficient and is in compliance with the <br /> purpose of Condition I. Further, that Condition I need not be <br /> amended. However, we suggest that the developer extend the <br /> plantings of ti corn plants along the entire fence. The ti corn <br /> plants can serve as a type of buffer along the adjoining property <br /> <br /> . as well as a possible additional deterrent to prevent people from <br /> trespassing onto the adjoining property. To accommodate concerns <br /> of the adjoining property owner, we also suggest that the <br /> developer place receptacles within the parking area both on the <br /> original commercial zoned area and the area covered by the <br /> subject ordinance. Further, in addition to the adjoining <br /> property owner's posted !'No Trespassing" signs, the developer <br /> should also post similar warning signs (i.e. no trespassing, do <br /> .not throw rubbish, etc.) on his property so as to advise patrons <br /> visiting the commercial businesses. <br /> <br />