My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0067.041 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0067.041 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 3:26:31 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:16:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0067
Point
041
Author
Jennifer Shibuya
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 1/19/07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2007/01/19 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
BIL 345 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0067.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Jennifer Shibuya testimony. Bill 345 <br /> TESTIMONY- BII,L 345 <br /> My name is Jennifer Shibuya and I am testifying in opposition to Bill 345. I agree <br /> there is a need for treatment facilities. I believe the whole community would benefit from <br /> more treatment services, but in order for that to happen it would be prudent for a bill to <br /> be passed that fully addressed the issue not just aband-aid fix. <br /> There aze too many holes in Bill 345. If we are going to fill the need for treatment <br /> facilities on this island we should do it right. This should involve soliciting community <br /> input about how to make this happen and creating some sort of master plan that addresses <br /> the needs of all affected parties. Telling people many of whom have lived in their <br /> residential neighborhood for yeazs, which was most likely by choice and many years of <br /> hard work, that you are going to have a business as your neighbor and if you don't like it <br /> too bad. Would these facilities be used as an alternative for person who might otherwise <br /> be sentenced to prison? There are many unanswered questions. These are issues that <br /> could potentially break apart a community, not bring it together. <br /> Part of the bill states "not more than eight unrelated persons, plus any program <br /> staff'. Exactly how many people are appropriate as staff? Is one staff member sufficient <br /> for eight people? Would it be okay for 10 program staff to live in the house too? The bill <br /> also states nothing about how many people can reside in one bedroom, how much <br /> personal space each person is entitled to, how many bedrooms and bathrooms the home <br /> should have. Is this bill stating that eight unrelated people living together in a one- <br /> bedroom one-bath home is okay? If I had a loved one who needed treatment I would <br /> want fewer not more people living in the house and I would want to have peace of mind <br /> knowing that they were in a therapeutic environment. I would also want regulations in <br /> Comm. No. <br /> ~~f• To:Preis <br /> ht,f. Late J N <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.