Laserfiche WebLink
Communication 32 <br /> <br /> Resolution 21 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> expressing strong opposition to Resolution No. ZI-07 stating the proposal is very poor, based on false <br /> premises, will not achieve benefits it claims, is anti-competitive and unfair. It also stated the proposal <br /> will harm families by keeping the price of food high and enables supermarket chains to maintain such <br /> high food prices. <br /> Council Member Pete Hoffmann requested, as a matter of courtesy to Mr. Higa, that this item be <br /> postponed to the next scheduled Planning Committee meeting on January 18, 2007. The motion to <br /> postpone to the January 18, 2007 Planning meeting was unanimously approved. <br /> At the January 18, 2007 meeting members of the public presented oral testimony at the Hilo Council <br /> Room as fellows: <br /> • Anthony Long (in opposition); <br /> • Francis Benevides, Sr. (position is neutral; would like superstores to work with retailers; <br /> • Rufus Sonognini (in opposition); <br /> • Jeanne Ryan testified (in support); <br /> • Rich Hedges (in support); <br /> • Linda Hedges (in support); <br /> • Mark McNett (testified that people want stores like Wa1Mart, Sam's Club, Tazget, etc.); <br /> • Lary Saltzman (in opposition). <br /> Committee Chair Pilago noted written testimonies of David Nardini (in support), Mary Marvin Porter (in <br /> opposition), Charles Flaherty (in support) and oral testimony from Kelly Drysdale at the Kona Council <br /> office (in support). <br /> Committee Chair Pilago discussed the opinion of Corporation Counsel relating to disclosure of Council <br /> Member Yagong's employment as District Manager of Food Pantry, Ltd. and Kalama Beach Corporation <br /> and his oversight of several retail outlets. Chair Pilago noted that his January 2, 2007 response to Mr. <br /> Yagong's disclosure states he feels Mr. Yagong is able to be fair and impartial in deciding this matter and <br /> did not see a potential conflict that would require disqualification. <br /> Council Member Stacy Higa stated this has not been a popular Resolution but he proposed it to be <br /> consistent with other counties. In his research of big box stores, the "grocery" component intrigued him <br /> and noted that although he is pro business and believes competition is healthy, the magnitude is his <br /> concern and the resolution seeks to raise the level and set a cap limit at 20,000 SKU's. Having visited big <br /> box stores on the mainland he found that these superstores were always placed neaz an interstate with no <br /> other businesses nearby. He noted that history shows local farmers have been squeezed out and have to <br /> sell their produce elsewhere. Mr. Higa hoped the resolution passes to allow the Planning Director and the <br /> Commission to further study the matter. <br /> Council Member Hoffmann said he did not come to any conclusion but would like to see more public <br /> input and testimony. In Mc Hoffinamt's discussion it was noted that the Kona and Hilo Wa1Mart stores <br /> would not be affected by the resolution and that Costco, although larger in size, would also not be <br /> affected since it does not contain 20,000 SKU dedicated to groceries. Mr. Higa noted that the only <br /> example or comparative of a business that would be banned currently exists only on the mainland at this <br /> time. Mr. Higa further noted that in order for an establishment to be banned pursuant to the resolution, it <br /> had to satisfy all three categories: exceed 90,000 gross squaze feet, have more than 25,000 SKU and more <br /> than 20,000 gross squaze feet dedicated to groceries. <br /> PC Report No. 6 <br /> <br />