My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP PC 013 02/21/2007 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2006-2008
>
Planning Committee (PC)
>
REP PC 013 02/21/2007 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 10:41:04 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:27:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2006-2008
Report
013
Committee
PC
Meeting date
2007-02-21
Comments
There were no Statements from the Public
Document Relationships
AGE PC 02/21/2007 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Plannning Committee (PC)
BIL 024 Draft 01 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 0086.000 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Communication 86 <br /> Bi1124 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> 5. Access to the site is from Awa Street, a County road with a 50-foot wide right-of--way <br /> with a 20-foot wide pavement and 6-foot wide grass shoulders. <br /> 6. County water is available to the property. The two additional parcels will utilize <br /> individual wastewater systems meeting the approval of the Department of Health. <br /> 7. The Planning Director recommended favorably on this request based on the following: <br /> • The proposed reclassification from the State Land Use Agricultural to the Urban <br /> District for approximately 2.649 acres will not be violative of Section 205-2, Chapter <br /> 205, Hawaii Revised Statutes, nor will the reclassification actions be inconsistent <br /> with the Hawaii Land Use Commission Rules, the Hawaii State Plan and the County <br /> General Plan. <br /> • The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map designates this area as Low <br /> Density Urban and the request conforms to the Economic and Land Use goals and <br /> policies of the General Plan. <br /> • The Urban classification also conforms to the standard that the development is within <br /> reasonable proximity to centers of trading and employment and to basic services such <br /> as schools, police and fire protection, transportation systems and water. <br /> • The U.S. Corps ofEngineers Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) designates the <br /> property as Zone "X", areas determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain. The <br /> property is located approximately 4.5 miles from the coastline and there are no <br /> existing drainageways or improvements in the vicinity of the property. <br /> • Due to extensive prior disturbance of the site, it is highly unlikely that any <br /> archaeological, cultural or historic sites are present on the property. The DLNR-HPD <br /> has states no historic properties will be affected by this undertaking because 1) <br /> residential development and/or urbanization has altered the land; 2) previous <br /> grubbing/grading has altered the land; and 3) there is no record of historic properties <br /> in the area, and that prior development for residential use has modified the landscape. <br /> • The State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to the Urban District <br /> complements the State Land Use District Regulations and is supportive of the State of <br /> Hawaii Plan and the General Plan. <br /> At the February 21, 2007 Planning Committee meeting, no public statements were received. Mr. <br /> Brian Nishimura, applicant's consultant, gave a brief presentation regarding applicant's proposed <br /> request for boundary amendment. Mr. Nishimura noted that the property is situated in the <br /> <br /> Panaewa Houselots Subdivision developed by the State of Hawaii. The project is located in the <br /> Second Increment consisting of 25 lots that were developed in 1964 and the First Increment <br /> consisting of 65 lots were developed in 1957. He noted that both increments were intended for <br /> residential purposes as evidenced by restrictive covenants placed on the property and that the <br /> PC Report No. 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.