Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 1 <br /> Murashige, Laura <br /> From: Broussard & Pomeroy [broupome@kona.net] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 5:06 PM <br /> To: County Council; Hoffmann, Pete <br /> Cc: Yagong, Dominic; Ikeda, Donald; Yoshimoto, J; Higa, Stacy; Naeole, Emily; Jacobson, Bob; Ford, <br /> Brenda; Pilago, K. Angel; Harry Kim <br /> Subject: Support of Bill 318 <br /> <br /> While I am very much in favor of a concurrency bill, its passage would be meaningless unless the Council, the <br /> Planning Department and their staff closely examines the "specs" prior to approving any zoning changes. <br /> I'll cite only one instance (which I can support in detail with the actual developer-provided data). At Kohala Ranch <br /> the urban zoniing was approved even though the developer submitted a traffic study--to both the state and the <br /> county--which indicated that, for many of the nearby roads, traffic would stay the same or actually DECREASE if <br /> the 3000-unit urban development in North Kohala were approved. <br /> _ <br /> r-' <br /> rw- <br /> "y <br /> J <br /> 307. ~ <br /> y~.~-~._~..~. <br /> 4/18/2007 <br /> <br />