My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0200.029 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0200.029 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 1:13:28 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0200
Point
029
Author
Margaret Willie
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: Council - 4/18/07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2007/01/19 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
COM 0200.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> 4 d 2 iii ELIMINATE this provision relating to satisfying the affordable housing requirement at <br /> the stage of final subdivision approval. All conditions for subdivision approval should be <br /> determined at the tentativelpreliminary review stage. Final subdivision approval is supposed to be <br /> simply a ministerial exercise of reviewing compliance with the conditions imposed at the stage of <br /> preliminary approval. Revisions made to the subdivision code last July did confuse the distinction <br /> between tentative and final subdivision review but don't add to that confusion. So that you <br /> understand, once a subdivision receives tentative subdivision approval, the developer can <br /> proceed with design and review of the construction plans. Once those construction plans are <br /> approved, then the developer can proceed with ALL infrastructure construction. Final subdivision <br /> approval is what allows the developer to start to sell the units. <br /> 7 Re' Districts where there is existing substantial affordable housing. Exempt this affordable <br /> housing requirement in those districts where there is existing substantial affordable housing <br /> available. Proposed language: "Every five years the planning director shall recommend to the <br /> County Council which districts have substantial affordable housing available. As of the effective <br /> date of this ordinance, the districts of Hilo and Puna are determined to have substantial affordable <br /> housing available. " <br /> Rationale: reasonable not to include this requirement in districts where affordable housing is not <br /> needed. <br /> Question: which districts currently have substantial affordable housing available --Puna? Hilo? <br /> any others? <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.