Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> <br /> / ~ <br /> MR. 'TYLER: Another point I want to make, and I think Mr. <br /> Reynolds brought up something of real value in terms of possible <br /> developer agreement is that, should this pass before this body, <br /> when if it finally passes before this body, the developer, KIC will <br /> not be coming back before this body, they'll be dealing, as <br /> Mr. Reynolds pointed out, with vazious departments. And it's no <br /> question, and I think everyone has acknowledged that there are <br /> going to be significant impacts to the Keauhou-Kahalu'u area. <br /> And, of course, we aze all aware that the many residents have <br /> expressed through their vazious associations, their concerns. <br /> I really think that an EIS would have been appropriate to properly <br /> address these impacts, we have, as I'm sure everyone here is <br /> aware, we have projects, small little projects that come to us, and <br /> the State requires them to provide an EIS, and some of them, the <br /> land's already been grubbed, graded, or there's been a commercial <br /> project there, but because of the nature of the project, you know, <br /> they have to go through this whole procedure. Yet, we have <br /> something here of such a great size and significance, and yet, we <br /> don't have the detailed information that would be provided through <br /> an EIS, and I realize that there's probably not enough votes here to <br /> require such a thing, it's late in the planning stage, but I really <br /> believe that, because of the nature of this, it's obvious impact, that <br /> this should be done as part of this rezoning, especially in <br /> consideration of some of the uncertainties that we have. <br /> And at the same time, I want to acknowledge the proposed <br /> amendment to Condition (O), and I hope that during the public <br /> hearing that you will bring this forward to speak to the residents <br /> and other concerned pazties about the specific language. There <br /> area certainly some merits to it, and I'd like to hear from the <br /> public. Tha<ilc you, Mr. Chairman. <br /> ACTING CI IR. SMITII: "thank you, Mr. "Tyler. Mr. Yagong. <br /> MR. YAGONG: Thank you, Mc Chairman. I guess the first thing <br /> 1've got to do is, applaud Mr. Reynolds for, as we're talking about <br /> this proposed amendment, obviously, if the amendment is <br /> implemented, it certainly would benefit his district. But, you <br /> know, I did vote in support of this project, but, you know I thiiilc <br /> my concern is warranted here, so I want to share this with KIC. <br /> I think the fair share contribution is always been a contribution that <br /> has gone to the County for the County to determine the distribution <br /> thereof And of all the projects that have come before the County <br /> Council, at least the year that I've been, we have never made an <br /> <br />