My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0200.040 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0200.040 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 1:14:35 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:43:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0200
Point
040
Author
David Callies
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC - 5/16/07
Document Relationships
AGE PC 06/19/2007 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Plannning Committee (PC)
COM 0200.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For example, the Supreme Court of New Jersey illustrated the applicability of this <br /> approach to non-residential development linkage fees in Holmdel Builders Association.40 There, <br /> in deciding whether to apply a "rational-nexus" test or a "reasonable relationship" test, the court <br /> found "a sound basis to support a legislative judgment that there is a reasonable relationship <br /> between unrestrained nonresidential development and the need for affordable residential <br /> development."a~ This relationship, the court explained, need only be "founded on the actual, <br /> albeit indirect and general, impact that such nonresidential development has on both the need for <br /> lower-income residential development and on the opportunity and capacity of municipalities to <br /> meet that need." Harmonizing its inclusionary zoning doctrine, the court noted that such zoning <br /> is "itself is based on that relationship.i42 <br /> On the other hand, a number of jurisdictions have strictly followed Dolan in the context <br /> of legislative monetary exactions. For example, in Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates <br /> <br /> Ltd. Partnership,43 the Supreme Court of Texas narrowly held that a legislative exaction <br /> concerning off-site public improvements was properly reviewed under Dolan.44 There, the town <br /> had the discretion to grant Stafford, a developer, a variance from the exaction requirement, <br /> 40Holmdel, 583 A.2d at 288. <br /> ai /d. <br /> az Id <br /> as 135 S.W.3d 620 (Tex. 2004). <br /> as Id. a[ 622-24. <br /> 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.