My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0668.001 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0668.001 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2008 12:47:03 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 8:01:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0668
Point
001
Author
Al Smith, Vice Chair
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 1/16/98
Communications - File Code
LEG
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 01/16/1998 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Honorable Al Smith <br /> <br /> Page 2 <br /> January 8, 1998 <br /> the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled against the County of Hawaii, are referenced in the <br /> fourth "whereas" clause. The reference to Hawaii Revised Statutes, §46-1.5 (22) is of no <br /> assistance as that statute merely provides that each county shall have the power to sue and <br /> <br /> be sued in its corporate name. Since all lawsuits filed against the County of Hawaii must <br /> rely on this statute for the authority to sue the county, we are unable to determine what <br /> two specific negligence cases the drafter of Resolution 97-219 had in mind. Perhaps City <br /> Council member Rene Mansho, the introducer of Resolution 97-219 would be a better <br /> source for this information? <br /> During the legal research for this response to your inquiry, we located a recent <br /> American Law Reports article entitled Skating Rink Injuries, 38 ALRSth 107, which, <br /> although written with ice and roller skating in mind, is still relevant and applicable to <br /> skateboarding and rollerblading: <br /> The general rules governing the duties and obligations of the <br /> operator of a public amusement, or the owner of the premises in which such <br /> an amusement is operated, have been recognized in all cases involving <br /> injury to patrons of ice or roller skating rinks. Clearly the owner or <br /> operator is not an insurer of safety for its patrons or invitees. Briefly stated, <br /> the duty is one of reasonable care in light of the circumstances presented <br /> and the hazards to be expected. This duty ordinarily includes the duty to <br /> maintain the premises and equipment in a reasonably safe condition for the <br /> contemplated use, to warn of nonapparent hazards, and to reasonably police <br /> other patrons. Thus, it is the specific duty of the owner or operator of a <br /> skating rink to maintain the skating surface and appurtenant areas, such as <br /> lobbies, seating areas, and entrance and exit ways, in a reasonably safe <br /> condition. An owner of a hockey rink is obligated to adequately protect <br /> spectators by providing screening in the most dangerous areas. <br /> An owner or operator's duty also extends to his equipment, thus he <br /> must provide adequate skates, if he rents equipment, and to exercise care in <br /> adjusting and fastening them if he chooses to do so. He is also obligated to <br /> protect his patrons from the actions of other skaters, including his own <br /> employees, through adequate supervision of both the rink and the premises. <br /> In addition, the courts have discussed the liability of skating rink <br /> establishments based upon other or unspecified duties owed to patrons. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.