My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0193.096 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0193.096 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 12:50:18 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:49:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0193
Point
096
Author
Lawrence W. Boyd, PH.D.
Communications - Referred To
N/A
Document Relationships
BIL 060 Draft 04 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 0193.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br /> grants from the federal government fund various mazijuana eradication programs. These <br /> total $360,900, so the one-third matching funds would be approximately $110,000. <br /> The costs of enforcement of distribution laws appeaz to be approximately $3 <br /> million. Thus the total costs for enforcing all of the marijuana laws aze in the $9 to $10 <br /> q million range.14 <br /> Enforcement efforts should restrict the supply of an illegal substance to such an <br /> <br /> ,r extent that they affect the price of that product. Therefore it is useful to report prices for <br /> various amounts of marijuana, which is done in Table 5. Figure 1, plots the "real" price <br /> of marijuana in Honolulu, that is the price of marijuana net of inflation. The real price <br /> indicates what its cost is relative to the other prices of goods that consumers buy. The <br /> price series indicates a 12% drop in the real price of one ounce of high quality marijuana <br /> between 1994 and 2003. Given vazious estimates of the relationship between marijuana <br /> prices and consumption, this would suggest a 6% increase in mazijuana consumption. <br /> 14 A minimum of $8 million, plus other legal costs. Miron (2005) estimates that the total <br /> cost of marijuana prohibition in Hawaii is $22 million. The differences between his <br /> estimates and these found here are first, I estimate police resources at $4 million while <br /> Miron estimates them at $2.7 million. The reason for this is that Miron reduces these <br /> arrests to stand alone an•ests, a procedure I believe is flawed in Hawaii for reasons <br /> outlined above. Second, Miron was unable to find data on the percentage of possession <br /> r convictions for marijuana and assumes it was equal to the percentage of trafficking <br /> convictions. In turn he estimates trafficking convictions at 10.9 percent, which he then <br /> multiplies by the judicial budget for 2002. In this report it was possible to determine <br /> actual possession hearings. It was further assumed that all trafficking arrests were heard <br /> in the following yeaz. The difference is substantial. Miron estimates judicial costs at <br /> ,w $19.6 million, while using the actual numbers found in the Hawaii State Judiciazy <br /> Reports were in the $1 million range. In terms of incarceration, Miron estimates that 1 <br /> 'r percent of the penal system's budget is used for incazcerating marijuana prisoners. His <br /> estimate is $1.96 million. In this report the actual number of prisoners are used and <br /> multiplied by per capita prisoner costs. The result is $910,000. Although the results aze <br /> ~ different from Miron's estimates, it should be noted that the difference lies in the fact that <br /> a large proportion of the court's resources aze not used for marijuana enforcement. <br /> .r <br /> 10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.