COM 0495.000 2006-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

KPMG LLP r PO Box 4150 Honolulu, HI 96812-4150 a Report on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to Each Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 r To the Members of the County Council of Hawaii County of Hawaii Hilo, Hawaii: n Compliance We have audited the compliance of the County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii (the County), with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) CircularA-133 Compliance Supplement that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the yeaz ended June 30, 2006. The County's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditors' results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to each of its major federal programs is the responsibility of the County's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the County's compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing y Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-]33 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the County's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination on the County's compliance with those requirements. In our opinion, the County complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2006. However, the results of our auditing procedures disclosed instances of noncompliance with those requirements, which are ~ required to be reported in accordance with OMB Circulaz A-133 and which aze described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as Findings 06-01 through 06-02. r r 5 KPMG LAP, a U 5 Ilmited llabiliry pertnerahlp. Is the U-S- .r member flan of KPMG Inwrnaupnal, a Swiss cooperative.