My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0637.003 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0637.003 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2016 2:29:29 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 8:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0637
Point
003
Author
Joseph K. Kamelamela, Deputy Corporation Counsel
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 04/01/1998 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Council
RES 248 Draft 01 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\1996-1998
RES 249 Draft 01 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jay Kimura, Esq. <br /> Page 2 <br /> In addition, the County has liabilities and immunities which differ from yours. In the <br /> context of the federal civil rights claim, there is no County liability in the absence of a County <br /> "custom" or "policy" which underlies the alleged violation of plaintiff's constitutional rights. As <br /> to you personally, there is no such doctrinal immunity. <br /> Conversely, you enjoy, as prosecuting attorney, absolute immunity from liability in the <br /> federal civil rights context, provided your conduct arises from your court activities and events <br /> incident thereto. Alternatively, "qualified immunity" is routinely granted individuals employed <br /> by governmental entities regardless of their governmental role. The County has neither absolute <br /> nor qualified immunity. <br /> To avoid these conflicts of interests, the County Council agreed to indemnify you Cor all <br /> damages, including punitive damages, and to have our office represent you. <br /> We find the probability ofpunitive damages to be remote. We believe that you acted in <br /> good faith and in the performance of your duty. <br /> You have, however, every right to be represented by counsel of your own choosing and at <br /> your own expense. If you choose your own separate counsel, the County will not appropriate <br /> funds for separate counsel, since the County Council agreed to indemnify you for all damages, <br /> including punitive damages. <br /> B. Unitary Rgpresentation Necessary. <br /> The advantages in unitary representation outweigh the speculative conflicts of <br /> interests. <br /> In our review of all pertinent reports and discussions with witnesses to date, we have yet <br /> to discern any material differences between you and the County. <br /> The advantages of unitary representation are the ease of communicating among you, us <br /> and other County officials and personnel, a coordinated and coherent defense, savings in time <br /> and expense, and the appearance of solidarity and harmony, all of which can be very important to <br /> a successful defense. <br /> We have already filed an answer to the complaint, and we are prepared to defend you <br /> <br /> with entire loyalty and vigor. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.