Laserfiche WebLink
a. <br /> Hawaii Society of <br /> Professional Engineers <br /> a state society of the National Society of Professional Engineers <br /> Kona-KOha/a Chapter • do 75-5749 Ka/awa Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 <br /> <br /> Honorable Pete Hoffmann, Chairperson <br /> Hawaii County Council <br /> 25 Aupuni St. <br /> Hilo, Hawaii 96720 <br /> Subject: Testimony In Opposition To Bi1151, Draft 4 <br /> An Ordinance Amending Chapter 27, Flood Control, <br /> Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), As Amended <br /> Relating To Storm Water Management <br /> Request To Delete Amendments To Bi1151, Draft 1 <br /> Request Approval for Creation of an Ad-Hoc Committee <br /> Previously Requested by Councilperson Ford to Evaluate Flood Issues and <br /> Impacts <br /> Dear Chairperson Hoffmann and Members of the Hawaii County Council, <br /> The Kona-Kohala Chapter of the Hawaii Society of Professional Engineers participated in the <br /> recent ad hoc committee meetings held to review the proposed amendments to Chapter 27 <br /> proposed by Councilpersons Ford and Hoffmann. Our chapter feels very strongly that all <br /> amendments proposed by the County Council should be deleted from the Bill until professional <br /> engineers, hydrologists and legal professionals can make recommendations as to the <br /> appropriateness of the amendments. Our reasons are as follows: <br /> 1. Councilman Hoffmann has failed to provide any background or explanation on how his <br /> proposed amendment to limit impervious surfaces will prevent flood damages. Our <br /> professional organization believes that limitations on the use of property belong in the <br /> Zoning Code, not Chapter 27. In addition, there are many zones that require a higher <br /> percentage of impervious surfaces in order to prevent urban sprawl. Some of these zones <br /> include commercial and industrial zones. <br /> 2. Councilperson Ford has stated the reason for her amendments was to create a code the <br /> goes beyond minimum standards. We believe that the existing provision of Chapter 27 <br /> are already much more restrictive than national standards. Many communities allow a <br /> rise in the base flood elevation. The County of Hawaii has a no-rise policy, which is <br /> above and beyond the FEMA requirement. In addition, the County of Hawaii requires <br /> infiltration of the increase in runoff from the 10 year, one hour storm. We do not know <br /> of any other community in the nation with this requirement. The 10-year, one-hour storm <br /> is also on the higher end of the design storms used nationally. The County of Hawaii <br /> requires calculation of the 100 year peak discharge for stream channels within watersheds <br /> over 100 acres in size which is also stricter than many communities across the country. <br /> <br />