My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0689.004 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0689.004 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2008 2:14:42 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 8:02:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0689
Point
004
Author
Harry Funamura, Wastewater Mangement Chief, County of Kauai
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 2/4/98
Communications - File Code
HCC/SEW
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 02/04/1998 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Council
COM 0689.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
design wastewater rates based on cost of service which will generate adequate <br /> revenues to support revenue requirements; <br /> develop an approach for gradually making the services provided by the Sewer <br /> Utility a self supporting enterprise activity; <br /> develop a computer model for the County to use in updating the wastewater rates; <br /> and <br /> develop aCounty-wide wastewater treatment plant assessment fee. <br /> The first step of the sewer user charge system review is to estimate future revenues of the <br /> wastewater system under existing rates. Projections are then also made for operating expenses and <br /> financing requirements associated with the capital improvement program. The corresponding revenues <br /> are then evaluated to determine if they are adequate to meet the operating expenses and capital <br /> improvement program needs. Six years are shown for planning purposes (fiscal years 1995-2000). <br /> The second step is a cost of service analysis which distributes expenses in accordance with <br /> various customer class demands. This distribution of costs provides for uniform unit costs to customers. <br /> Customer classifications are then assigned costs of service based on their own customer demands or <br /> loadings to the wastewater facilities. The cost of service analysis provides a guide toward making rate <br /> adjustments for each customer class. <br /> From the results of the cost of service analysis, the final step, rate design, is accomplished. We <br /> recommend that residential customers be charged a fixed base charge plus a charge based on metered <br /> water usage, subject to a volume cap. Such an approach more closely corresponds with the cost of <br /> providing service. The billing process must be coordinated with the Department of Water before usage- <br /> based rates can be implemented. The maximum volume cap for residential units is recommended to <br /> be 9,000 gallons per month which assumes a family of three at 100 gallons per capita per day. This <br /> amount is fairly standard and is the same maximum cap used in both Honolulu and Maui. (Honolulu <br /> eliminated its cap last year). <br /> Scope <br /> This study includes the results of analyzing the costs of providing wastewater services by the <br /> Sewer Utility. As discussed earlier, total revenue requirements are developed, allocation of costs to <br /> customer classes is completed with the resulting proposed wastewater rates based on a system of <br /> metered water and metered wastewater usage. <br /> Analyses of historical trends are included which show the number of customers, number of units, <br /> water sales and wastewater flows and strengths. Annual growth projections are included for the study <br /> period. <br /> Revenue requirements include operation and maintenance, existing and proposed debt service <br /> requirements, capital improvement projects, and equipment replacement reserves. Changing conditions <br /> such as additional facilities, recognition of growth, and nonrecurring maintenance expenditures are <br /> recognized. Inflation for ongoing expenditures as well as capital improvement projects is included to <br /> <br /> reflect cost escalation. <br /> 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.