Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Castle & Cooke HawaSi Fax :8085482980 Aug 17 2007 14:3" P.OS <br /> ,mil««~~: <br /> Inly 10, 200 <br /> The Honorable Pete Hoffman <br /> Council Chatr & Presiding Officer <br /> Hawai i County Council <br /> 25 Aupuni Street <br /> Hilo, IdI96720 <br /> By Fax: 808-961-8912 and E~Mail: counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us <br /> RE: BILL II2 -Relating to Affordable Housing - OPPOSL~ WITH COMMENT <br /> Hawai I County Council Meetiutg, Tuesday, July 70, 2007 - 9AM <br /> Aloha Chair Hoffman and Councilmembers: <br /> T am Bruce Garrett: Executive Vice President of Castle & Cooke Homes Hawaii, Inc. <br /> Castle & Cooke strongly opposes Bill II2. Tn general, exactions that legitimately <br /> address project imparts should be imposed as explicit, upfront conditions to obtainin <br /> entitlements at State land use or County zoning, and not conditions to sulxiivision. <br /> Subdivision is traditionally a ministerial process after substantial planning and invest Went <br /> have already occurred in reliance upon entitlements. Castle & Cooke submits that : a <br /> rna[ter of basic fairness, a costly and unforeseen affordable requirement should not br <br /> imposed on a fully entitled project already under development like our Wehilani proj~ ct <br /> in ~Vaikoloa Village. <br /> We fully suppott programs and lei station that provide incentives to encourage <br /> development of affordable housing for local families. Ra[her than mandate the <br /> construction of affordable housing, we feel that the County should provide incentives to <br /> promote the development of affordable housing to reduce the cost and risk of <br /> development [hereby encouraging the private sector to develop more affordable hou; ng <br /> We beliecc that Bill 112 wilt ncgativety impact the supply of housing because it maht s it <br /> infeasible co complete and go forward wi[h entitled projects already under dcvclopme tt <br /> like our Wehilani project. <br /> We respectfully rayuest the County Council's consideration of the following fac[ors atd <br /> circumstances with respect to Bill 1.12 generally, and in particular, its unfair impact on <br /> nurability to complete. the Wehilani project. <br /> It has been Hawaii's traditional practice to exact conditions at the entitlement proses>'. at <br /> the State land use and county rezoning processes. This practice results in predictabili~;; <br /> helps to define land planning up front and commitments for the tuturet and, allows <br /> developers and state and county governments to plan and fund development accordirpy <br /> Bill 112 contradicts th,s practice by creatin, an affordable housing requirement at the <br /> Conan: ~~os. l ~ <br /> Ref. Ta <br /> Ref. Date 22 2QQ~ <br /> <br />