My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0349.904 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0349.904 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 7:30:54 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 6:16:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0349
Point
904
Author
Chris Haley
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 9/19/07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2007/09/19 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
COM 0349.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> (1) Without screenng [he sites will still be vjsjble from important public view <br /> points, both on the sea and on land. Although the views from land-based <br /> positions such as Warrington are likely to be limited, in certain conditions <br /> and sunlight we suspect that at lease one house will be clearly vjsjble. This <br /> was accepted by Mr Rackhanr whose proposal was to provide for <br /> mitigatory planting which would eventually screen houses from land-based <br /> views. However, Mr Rackham did not suggest any mitigation in respect of <br /> the views available from the sea. We have concluded that the houses <br /> would be clearly visible from the sea in most conditions, pazticulazly Crorn <br /> one to two kilometres offshore. Although that viewing audience may not <br /> be large, we consider this area is likely to be subject to passing sea traffic, <br /> including cruise liners from time to lime. <br /> (2) The effect of screening is particularly uncertain given the following <br /> factors: <br /> (a) the climatic factors, particularly the wind and lack of summer rain; <br /> (b) the slow growth and need for good height of any plants to provide <br /> screening of the buildings from other Land viewpoints. In this iegard <br /> [here was a suggestion that the growth may be sufficient within five <br /> to eight years. For our part we conclude, assuming the plants do not <br /> require replacement, that it is likely to be in the order of 10 to 15 <br /> years before any planting would provide sufficient screening. By <br /> that time the initial change to the visual environment will have <br /> become firmly established; <br /> (c) we have concluded that there is a real potential for any mitigation <br /> screening and compensatory planting, in itself, to emphasise the <br /> existence or likely presence of a dwelling. In llris regard we accept <br /> the ecological evidence that the replication or enhancement of the <br /> existing remnant planting will be particularly difficult. It is likely to <br /> require extensive maintenance, irrigation and care. We conclude that <br /> even with careful planning, such planting is likely to stand out. This <br /> ;\~~SEAL p`FT <br /> ~ js a prominent and wind-swept point. Plants have considerable <br /> ' ~~C difficulty becoming established naturally and take many generations <br /> III <br /> ({.k'o4 N:t~'~T'~ <br /> <br /> m ~(1;.,,`P.;~~; o to reach full maturity. Thriving native plants grown quickly on this <br /> J~Mi` Q <br /> .~F t~ ~I" e 'p•JJw e <br /> /.zC <br /> ~~~~~IIS~ 4j~ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.