My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0349.904 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0349.904 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 7:30:54 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 6:16:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0349
Point
904
Author
Chris Haley
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 9/19/07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2007/09/19 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
COM 0349.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
z <br /> [2] The original application sought a subdivision of the property. [f granted this <br /> would have petnritted the construction of the houses as a controlled activity. However, <br /> Blueskin have now widertaken a boundary adjustment, creating sections 41 and 42, with <br /> section 42 having been sold to a third party. <br /> [3j Accordingly, it is now their intention to construct two houses on tfie one title, <br /> section 41, and they therefore seek to amend the application from subdivision to consent <br /> for the construction of two residences on the same title. Annexed hereto and mazked <br /> "A" is a copy of the updated plan showing section 41 as uow proposed, with the <br /> approximate position of the two houses shown as A and B. <br /> Issues <br /> [4] Issues arise as to whether or not this change is within jurisdiction. If so, it is <br /> agreed that the application is for a restricted discretionary activity, with the relevant <br /> criteria being set out in section 14.6.3(b)(ii) and the relevant assessment criteria from <br /> section 14.7. <br /> [5] In respect of the visual impact arising a corollary issue is whether or not the <br /> planting proposed by the appellant mitigates the visual impact arising or is alternative <br /> compensatory or mitigatory works. <br /> [6] Li the course of the hearing it also became clear that the applicant intends to <br /> remove a number of senescent indigenous trees to construct the house in the azea <br /> identi5ed as B. This may, in fact, require a further consent from the Council, depending <br /> on the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Plan. <br /> The setting <br /> [7] Potato Point is a well rounded headland crowned with remnant bush. While its <br /> l~~~gEnt o`TyF western slopes were historically subdivided as part of the township and Purakaunui. <br /> f~' he balance of Potato Point has been managed as part of a farm unit for some time. On <br /> <br /> m <br /> 9 ~ ~w~ ~ <br /> nF 'i ~.:vd <br /> T^ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.