Laserfiche WebLink
Council Testimony September 19a' 2007 <br /> <br /> Madame Councilwomen and councilmen; <br /> I have sat before you numerous times in the last year as we have debated the future of the <br /> ahupua'a of Punalu'u. Each time I and my associates, members of Ka'u preservation and <br /> <br /> the wider community shared with you our hope and vision for this very special place and <br /> sacred lands. <br /> You aze awaze of all that has transpired in the various hearings. You have heazd the pros <br /> and cons of a development and the pros and cons of making a park on the Ahupua'a of <br /> Punalu'u. <br /> I believe that you have felt that in general the testimony was heaztfelt and sincere. AND <br /> that it was presented in a respectful atmosphere where various positions could be shazed. <br /> In the biggest hearing on June 4a' in Na'alehu over 450 residents showed up and testified <br /> until almost midnight. Of those who spoke and those who attended over two thirds of <br /> them were opposed to the development and favored the pazk being created. <br /> The chairperson of that meeting,Mr Yagong, praised all who attended for the respect that <br /> they showed to their fellow citizens when they testified. <br /> Yet,the mediators in their report have indicated that people they interviewed felt <br /> intimidated by Ka'u Preservation. Up until now, we have been quiet regarding the <br /> allegations that have been made against us and pazticulazly against the leadership of Ka'u <br /> Preservation. We had eazly on identified a conscious effort on the part of the developer to <br /> split the community by grabbing onto very old rivaMes and then using them to divide the <br /> community. We refused to bite. We went on with our efforts in spite of these attacks. <br /> It has been the main concerted effort of the developers and those that they enlisted in <br /> their cause to plant endless doubts about our sincerity and commitment to the key issues <br /> of the resolution of the development or non development of the Punalu'u Ahupua'a. <br /> Eazly on they began using words like thugs and bullies to describe us. Somewhere they <br /> conveniently ignored the host of experts in the fields of anthropology,azcheology,marine <br /> sciences, urban planning and cultural practitioners who came ,often at great expense of <br /> time and distance, to testify to the need to preserve the Ahupua'a of Punalu'u. <br /> Were they thugs and bullies ?And when us common folk testified with our heart and soul <br /> were we the thugs and bullies ? <br /> I must confess that it was a masterfiil campaign carefully orchestrated and directed using <br /> the old tactic of consistency.....no matter what the facts ALWAYS refer to the Ka'u <br /> Preservation folks as thugs and bullies. <br /> To be successful it was necessary to ignore any effort of reconciliation by Ka'u <br /> Preservation. On the night of June 4a', after the very long hearing, I walked crossed the <br /> gym floor to greet Mr. Enriques. I told him of our developing plan to hold a cultural and <br /> music festival. I asked him to allow me to come and talk to his members about the <br /> festival. He responded that the festival was away of making money for our cause and a <br /> propaganda tool. I repeated my request and his response was I don't think so. I reassured <br /> him that I was ,at that very time, pursuing additional grants so that the festival would be a <br /> free event and that the primary purpose was COMMUNITY BUILDING....bringing <br /> people together. I also told him that I fully expected that Ka'u Preservation would realize <br /> zero profit. A prediction that was to be fulfilled on September ls~ and 2"a <br /> con,. Na. 3 ~ 9.913 <br /> Ref. To:e!yee!-' <br /> Ref. Date <br /> <br />