My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0666.018 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0666.018 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2008 12:37:24 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 6:37:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0666
Point
018
Author
Christoper J. Yuen, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 11/07/07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2007/10/17 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
AGE COUNCIL 2007/11/07 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
BIL 176 Draft 02 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planners <br /> Page 8 <br /> Apri121, 2003 <br /> concurrence on the significance assessments, effect determinations, and proposed <br /> mitigation. <br /> In most cases, the presence of historic sites alone will not cause us to recommend denial <br /> of a rezoning or redistricting, although it may be a factor. In the ordinary case, if we are <br /> otherwise going to recommend approval, we will handle the historic sites by way of <br /> conditions of approval. Our standard conditions will be as follows: <br /> 1. Prior to any land disturbance, that there be anSHPD-approved interim <br /> mitigation plan. <br /> 2. Prior to final subdivision approval, or plan approval for projects that <br /> may not result in subdivisions, that there be anSHPD-approved final <br /> mitigation plan. <br /> 3. That the applicant shall comply with all conditions of the interim and <br /> final mitigation plan. <br /> 4. That the sites listed for preservation on the mitigation commitment <br /> shall be preserved in place, with buffers as recommended on the <br /> interim or final mitigation plan, as the case maybe, and that they be <br /> <br /> 1 delineated as archaeological preservation easements on the final <br /> subdivision map, or in some other map if the project is not going to be <br /> subdivided. <br /> 5. That if any sites are found, construction shall cease, etc. <br /> 6. That "data recovery" sites can be converted to "preservation" sites <br /> (sometimes developers would prefer to do this because of the cost of <br /> data recovery.) <br /> 7. Burials shall be treated per an approved burial treatment plan. The <br /> applicant does not have to have the plan approved before the Planning <br /> Commission hearing, but we need to have the burials identified so that <br /> we know what the constraints will be on the development of the <br /> property. As previously stated, the plan will generally require the <br /> burials to be preserved in place, with buffers. <br /> There is a possibility that SHPD will not have approved stages 1-4 of the process by the <br /> time that we must make a recommendation to the Planning Commission for a rezoning. <br /> This can happened for a number of reasons, even though there should be enough time <br /> under the SHPD rules. If there has been an inventory survey, but SHPD has not <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.