COM 0267.006 2006-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

TORIGOE: Well, it depends on your timeframe because there is a 120-day timeframe on these Council-initiated issues. So I think in the past we've basically interpreted your rules and the Code to require a good faith effort within the time that you are given. So, you know, that's what I think we should look at. If you can't get a vote today and if you aze still within the 120 days, you should probably try again. And I don't know if staff can tell us where we aze. GRAHAM: All right, thank you. Anything further before we go for a vote? Go ahead, Jeff. DARROW: Just for clazification purposes, the motion before us is to send a favorable recommendation for the Planning Director's proposed redraft and an unfavorable recommendation of the County Council's proposed amendment. Is that correct? WATANABE: Yes. Or do you want to keep that sepazate? GRAHAM: I think we wanted to keep it separate. WATANABE: Okay, okay. Then it will be just a favorable then, just a favorable for the Planning Director's, with the Planning Director's proposed changes. WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman? GRAHAM: Yes, Commissioner Woodwazd. WOODWARD: Yeah, I think it really needs to be separate because if one of us is against the Director's proposal, and we aze also against the other one; if we vote no, then we aze saying no to the Director's proposal and yes to the other one. So there needs to be separate votes. WATANABE: Yeah, it has been sepazated. WOODWARD: Okay. GRAHAM: All right, Jeff, do you want to take the roll? DARROW: Sure. The motion before us is to send a favorable recommendation to the Hawaii County Council for the Planning Director's proposed redraft of the pazking requirements. With that, I'll take the vote. Commissioner Watanabe? WATANABE: Aye. DARROW: Commissioner Alameda? ALAMEDA: Aye. DARROW: Commissioner Iwashita? 6