My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0267.008 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0267.008 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 4:09:37 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 6:40:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0267
Point
008
Author
Michael Riehm
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 10/17/07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2007/10/17 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
BIL 079 Draft 02 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Michael ~ Sonja Riehm -Testimony Bi1179 -10!17107 <br /> My name is Michael Riehm and 1 am here to testify against <br /> Bill 79. All across the nation, citizens are taking great <br /> <br /> strides in designing their communities to reduce their <br /> <br /> dependency on the automobile and oil, be environmentally <br /> sensitive and promote sustainability. Here in Hawaii, where <br /> we are blessed with one of the most beautiful places in the <br /> world and where land is so precious, we are trying to pass <br /> Bill 79, which will do just the opposite, create more <br /> dependency on the automobile and oil, create more <br /> pollution, increase heat loads in our communities and <br /> basically pave paradise. <br /> It is my opinion, the suggested parking ratios introduced in <br /> Bill 79 are extreme and without any type of credible <br /> rationale. I have lived in Hawaii for 20 years and I can count <br /> on one hand the times 1 did not find a parking place so why <br /> are we in some cases increasing the parking 2 to 3 times <br /> from what the existing zoning code requires? For example, <br /> the Walmart in Kailua-Kona would need a parking lot almost <br /> twice the size of the existing lot. Most of all the existing <br /> multi-family projects, if built by this new bill, would required <br /> twice as much parking area. Now { ask you, is this <br /> ao <br /> reasonable? <br /> N <br /> I have researched a number of other cities on the mainland <br /> and I do not find any that require this much parking so why <br /> 1 of 2 <br /> ne oe <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.