COM 0700.004 2006-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

The Honorable K. Angel Pilago October 12, 2007 Page 3 At this same meeting, Direc#or Christopher Yuen indicated that the assurances given by the Applicant (aka Westpro Development} that an extension of Kakahiaka Sheet would be built was in the context of °a property owner who owns several lots and potentially develop the lots in the immediate area." ('I'R: Apri121, 2006, pg. 7, para. 5) 6. At the May 5, 2006 meeting of the County of Hawaii Planning Commission, Mr, Puke stated that, "I can tell you that the Applicant right now who also owns the re~naating three parcels will be filing for a SLU District Boundary Amendment for the remaining area to continue this type of a project (1'R: May 5, 2006, pg. 4, para. 5) 7. On September 22, 2004, the Hawaii County Council adopted Ordinance No. 04-105 reclassifying 10.001 acres of land from the SLU Agricultural District to the SLU Urban District. 8. In the later months of 2006, the Applicant (Seascape Development, LLC) requested of and received a LUC docket number (LUC Docket No. A06-768) for the purposes of processing a petition far district boundary amendment (DBA) with the Land Use Commission. Since receiving that docket ntunber, the Applicant has not yet filed any petition with the Comrission. 9. Contrary to their stated intentions, Seascape Development LLC filed utstead, an application with the Counl of Hawaii for State Land Use Boundary Amendment for 10.001 acres of land from the Agriculiural to the Urban District. I have communicated my conrnrn to Mr. Christopher Yuen, Director of Planning that the subject petition for DBA should be properly submitted to the jurisdiction of the Land Use Commission, but have yet to receive a response which address my concerns. 10. I subsequently appeared before the Planning Commission on July 20, 2007 and provided oral testimony expressing my concerns and offered to discuss strategies with the Petitioner which might still allow this very worthy project to move forward in a legally defensible manner. The matter was continued by the Commission to allow defects in notice to be corrected.