My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP PC 045 09/05/2007 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2006-2008
>
Planning Committee (PC)
>
REP PC 045 09/05/2007 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 10:34:48 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 6:43:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2006-2008
Report
045
Committee
PC
Meeting date
2007-09-05
Document Relationships
AGE PC 09/05/2007 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Plannning Committee (PC)
BIL 164 Draft 01 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
BIL 164 Draft 02 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 0633.000 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Communication 633 <br /> <br /> Bill 164 <br /> <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> source improvements on their own but aze complying through a source agreement that has <br /> already been completed. Mr. Ashikawa explained that potential water units are from a project <br /> known as the Haseco Water Agreement from which Wainani 42 has secured water units for their <br /> project. He stated the excess water units from the Haseco Water Agreement, are the water units <br /> applicant plans to use for Increment II. <br /> Council Member Higa expressed that it sounded like applicant fully intends to develop all 34 <br /> lots. Based on concerns members have expressed about not having any affordable housing lots if <br /> applicant is unable to obtain the necessary water units, Mr. Higa suggested that applicant set <br /> aside the three affordable lots from Increment I. In that way the council would be assured that if <br /> applicant did not get the necessary water commitments, the county would not lose out on three <br /> affordable lots. Applicant stated that could not be done because all lots in Increment I have been <br /> sold. <br /> Committee Chair Pilago stated that the application submitted in 1997 was part and parcel to three <br /> affordable lots. The applicant complied with affordable housing requirement in February 2005 <br /> when he signed the agreement with the County, agreeing to give 3 affordable lots in Increment I <br /> at 140% median. Mr. Pilago noted that for some reason the County, in September 2005, released <br /> applicant from the affordable housing requirement such that if Increment II did not have enough <br /> water, the applicant still would not be required to provide the three affordable lots. <br /> A motion to amend Bill 164 as contained in a September 5, 2007 letter distributed to the <br /> members was approved. The amendment reestablishes the old language of Condition K <br /> (contained in the original ordinance) and also amends Condition O which changes the word <br /> "may" to "shall" and corrects "it" to "its". <br /> Your Committee on Planning is in accord with the purpose and intent of Bill No. 164, as <br /> amended to Draft 2, and recommends it pass first reading. <br /> and <br /> _ AYES NOES A&E EX RESjleCtflllly SU111I1ntIC(I, <br /> FORD x <br /> HIGA X COIvIMITTEE ON PLANNING <br /> HOFFMANN X <br /> II{EDA X <br /> JACOB50N X ' <br /> NAEOLE X K ANGEL PILA ,CHAIR <br /> PII.AGO X <br /> YAGONG X PC REPORT NO. 45 <br /> YosxrnzoTO x ADOPTEn: ~€P 1 9 2001 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.