My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0598.027 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0598.027 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 10:11:29 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 6:49:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0598
Point
027
Author
Nancy E. Burns, P.E., LLC
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 11/7/07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2007/11/07 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
BIL 151 Draft 03 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
BIL 151 Draft 03 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bill 151 Flood Management -Brenda Ford Presentation -Transcription <br /> Kona Community Meeting - 700PM -October 9, 2007 -State Pavilion -Old Airport <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> in 24 hours over in the Puna, Hilo area, in 2000 I think it was. So, I don't know why they think it doesn't <br /> <br /> flood in Hilo, but there are people who believe that, or want to believe that. <br /> My greatest opposition on this bill is a group of engineers and architects who believe that we <br /> shouldn't do anything that's going to cost any more money, especially to any developers who are building <br /> <br /> these large subdivisions or commercial developments. I personally don't agree with that. You've heard <br /> <br /> Mr. Edgar talk about the flooding that's going on in his farm. I personally went out to see that flood. Mr. <br /> <br /> Pilago was with me, and that flooding exposed the entire root mats of the coffee trees. I don't know how <br /> much they lost that year in production but it's probably serious. We're getting flooding on our farm areas <br /> were going to have flooding. We've had flooding off of Lako St. There's some of the laterals off of Lako <br /> St., where they have 3 ft of water going through the house, because the uphill property had a wall, and it <br /> <br /> ponded, and it overflowed, into their house and down the street to the next one. <br /> We do not have a storm drainage system any place in this county. Our roads are the storm <br /> drainage system. And what looks like storm drains for those of us who come from other parts of the <br /> country, those are dry wells. The ls` inch of rain that falls will be collected in those dry wells, up to a ]0- <br /> year storm event. And after that, it goes down the street and into someone else's property. Repeatedly, [ <br /> have asked this group of engineers and architects, when you build an impervious surface, where there's a <br /> roof, sidewalk, road, driveway, whatever, that disallows water to percolate into the soil, what are you <br /> <br /> going to do with the water that now can't percolate in? And to date I have not had an answer. Because <br /> <br /> they don't want to answer that question of what to do with that water. They want to pretend like it's just <br /> <br /> going to vanish. But its not vanishing, it's going onto the neighbor's property or into our roads for us to <br /> <br /> have to deal with. <br /> This same group of architects and engineers went to the mayor presented him with their concerns. <br /> And I should have brought the paper with me, but in writing their solution to the flooding, whatever cause <br /> its coming from, was to have the tax payers, I'd like to quote this to you "Regional flood control projects <br /> will be an effective use of tax dollars (that's your money) and will solve flooding problems on a larger <br /> scale." While that's true, I personally resent sticking the taxpayer with the flood control projects, we <br /> should not be paying for something that is developer generated. That's my position. <br /> So I have been pushing the bill, we started with Bill 51, and after a multitude of changes, it got so <br /> cumbersome, that I've put in a new bill, 151. It's just a fluke that the numbers came out like that. And <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.