My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0295.007 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0295.007 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 4:47:28 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 6:57:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0295
Point
007
Author
Mark Ono and Shayne Veriato
Communications - Referred To
HSEDC
Comments
Presented: HSEDC - 1/8/08
Document Relationships
AGE HSEDC 01/08/2008 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Human Services & Economic Development Committee (HSEDC)
RES 134 Draft 02 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
long-term solutions, wildlife disease risks as it relates to the butchering of possibly <br /> contaminated meat, the state-level regulations as it pertains to the control of feral pigs on <br /> private property, and specifications for trap building for individuals interested and <br /> competent in trapping problematic pigs themselves. <br /> 4.1 Carcass Disposition <br /> As owners or lessees of the properties that were serviced, residents and <br /> noncommercial agricultural farmers were given the opportunity to assume <br /> responsibility of the pig carcasses for human consumption or give it to an <br /> interested second party. Every effort was made by APHIS-WS personnel to <br /> influence the people being serviced to utilize the meat for human consumption, <br /> although the final decision was left to the land owner or lessee. APHIS-WS <br /> documented that 104, or 47%, of the 221 pigs captured were consumed. The <br /> remaining carcasses were disposed of at the Hilo Landfill. <br /> <br /> 5.0 METHODS AND RESULTS <br /> Three primary control methods (cage traps, leg snares and shooting with suppressed <br /> rimfire rifles) were used to remove 221 injurious feral pigs from 64 trapping locations, <br /> most of which were residential properties (Table 3). Despite the assumption that cage <br /> traps would be the primary control method when the project was initiated, leg snares <br /> were deemed more useful in areas where feral pigs could not be baited into a cage trap, or <br /> where there were no suitable aeeas to place a cage trap. A description of each method <br /> and associated results are provided below. <br /> 5.1 Cage Traps <br /> Cage traps were deployed and baited with papayas, Fermented corn, macadamia <br /> nuts and/or bananas to control feral pigs. Over this report period, a total of 88 <br /> pigs were captured using cage traps representing 40% of the total catch. <br /> 5.2 Leg Snares <br /> Non-lethal leg mazes were deployed on trails leading into properties and <br /> agriculture fields that have been encountering feral pig damages. Over this report <br /> period, a total of 128 pigs were captured using leg snares representing 58% of the <br /> total catch. <br /> 5.3 Shooting <br /> Pigs were occasionally observed outside of a cage trap or alongside of a pig <br /> caught in a leg snare. In these instances, selective opportunistic shooting <br /> provided a means to remove problematic individuals that could have potentially <br /> been leery, or "trap-shy", of trapping devices. This method was very seldom <br /> used, and only when safe shots were observed. Suppressed rimfire rifles were <br /> used to humanely shoot free-ranging pigs at close range. Over this report period, <br /> a total of five feral pigs were shot outside of a cage trap representing 2% of the <br /> total catch. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.