Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> costs and expenses incurred by the COUNTY for the acquisition of the <br /> <br /> condemned land in conjunction with the COUNTY'S exercise of its cendea r atr' n <br /> <br /> powers." (Exhibit J-45). <br /> Development Agreement Reimbursement <br /> <br /> 37. Oceanside retained the Parsons engineering firm, specifically Wayne Yosh'cka, <br /> <br /> to develop the reimbursement model based on traffic analysis. (Test. of t^i <br /> <br /> Yoshioka, 7/23/07 (45;21-40:10)). In developing his methodology, Yoshioka <br /> <br /> relied heavily on the traffic model from the 1991 Hawaii Long Range Highw rr <br /> Plan ("LRP"). (Exhibit J-347); (Test of W. Yoshioka, 7/23/07 (53:25-54A) J. <br /> <br /> 38. The LRP used 1986 traffic data with 1987 traffic conditions. (Exhibit J-347) <br /> <br /> 39. Yoshioka used the Traffic Analysis Zone ("TAZ's" j from the t RP. ; Exhibit,' : 471 <br /> <br /> (Test. of W. Yoshioka, 7/23/07 (63:8 65:14)). These TAZ's are regional are< e <br /> <br /> that are used to geographically divide the island. <br /> 40. Yoshioka's report relied upon the completion of the AN Highway and only <br /> <br /> analyzed the traffic situation out to 2005 and 2010. (Exhibit J-384); (Test of W <br /> <br /> Yoshioka. (7/23107 (71,2-4)). Yoshioka did not analyze the traffic impact of tir: <br /> <br /> workforce for the Kohala resorts driving from Ka'u. (Test ofW Yoshioka, (6' S- <br /> <br /> 19)). <br /> 41. The stated methodology for the allocation of a percentage of a developers 1, :ir <br /> <br /> share" assessment was the impact on traffic a prospective developer's projer <br /> <br /> would have or "but for" the bypass which developers would not be allowed to <br /> <br /> build. (Test. of W. Moore, 7/10/07 (60:24.61:9)). <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> II <br />