Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Background on CIP Bond Amendment <br /> 11 17 98 <br /> <br /> 1. Count. Building: In 1995 DRH and the Mayor's Committee iyere 2i% en assurances <br /> that the County Building would be rerimated for accessibility during 1996. This teas <br /> not done. reportedly because of the plans to relocate County offices to the Penms <br /> <br /> Building. But the offices remain vv here they are. and remain very inaccessible. The <br /> architect's suryeN has already been done for this building. To some people this looks <br /> like stall tactics. (We kiimN of one local business that has claimed for fire years that <br /> it ould be ntoyinL "nest year" as an excuse v\h,\ they didn't become accessible this <br /> year. We understand that that business ~~as recently sued.) <br /> <br /> 2. Tax Office: DRH received a complaint from an out of state wheelchair user «ho ryas <br /> told at tite Tax Office that they had no table at ~N hich lie could inspect the tax maps. <br /> All counters are inaccessible. He had to leayc \N ithout doing his business. (This <br /> complaint has not Net been pas~ed on to the Administration We are \yaitiug for <br /> permission from the complainant.) <br /> <br /> <br /> 3. Senior Centers: DRH vv as im ok ed in an inspection of a Senior Center which is <br /> party inaccessible. It «as reported that the Senior vohntteers tylto administer the <br /> Center had. on their mN it. decided that ~yheelchairs «ould not be allrn~ ed. Wheelchair <br /> users Nv ere told that they could not brine their heelchairs to the Center. The <br /> volunteers v\ ere afraid that if the inaccessibiIt h of the Center vas made obvious by <br /> the presence of iyheeIchairs. the Center ~v ould be closed down by the County. This is <br /> blatantly illegal discrimination against people v~ ith disabilities. (This complaint iyas <br /> made to Protection and Advocacy. not to DRH. We only did the inspection. and do <br /> not knm v the present status of the complaint.) <br /> <br /> <br /> d. Items 3. 4. and parts of 5 miLlit be cmy!red in the Parks and Recreation settlement. <br /> Ncyertheless. they are of hiLh enouLh priority that eye feel targeted funding is <br /> justified. But much of the Bay front project is ne« development. and so not covered <br /> by the settlement. Still it is important to the accessibility of our Island. <br />