My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0998.003 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0998.003 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2008 11:20:45 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 7:14:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0998
Point
003
Author
Chris Yuen, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
PC: Postpones Bill 237 to the Planning Committee Meeting scheduled for April 8, 2008 - 3/11/08
Document Relationships
AGE PC 03/11/2008 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Plannning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 04/08/2008 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Plannning Committee (PC)
BIL 237 Draft 01 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Honorable Angel Pilago, Chair <br /> And Members of the Committee on Planning <br /> COMMITTEE ON PLANNING <br /> Page 3 <br /> March 5, 2008 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> landowner's zoning to a less intensive use. The law recognizes, however, that land <br /> development proceeds in stages, and that after a certain point, the owner should be <br /> allowed to complete a project as planned, and be protected from changes. The term <br /> normally used is that the owner has "vested rights" to proceed with a development. <br /> In Hawai'i land use law, the developer has "vested rights" when there is no further <br /> discretionary action required for the project to proceed, and the owner has expended <br /> substantial amounts in reliance upon that final discretionary action. Kauai County v. <br /> Pacific Standard Life Ins. Co., 65 Haw. 318 (1982). The "discretionary action" is a key <br /> concept. It means a permit or other approval that requires the decisionmaker to exercise <br /> judgment ("discretion") in deciding whether or not to issue the permit or approval. In a <br /> discretionary action, the decisionmaker must weigh a number of factors against broad <br /> standards given by the law. <br /> <br /> The other type of permit, in contrast to a discretionary permit, is a "ministerial" permit: <br /> one where the factors leading to a decision are described with such precision that nothing <br /> is left to discretion, where the duty to act is absolute, clear, and imperative, 63C Am.Jur. <br /> 2d Public Officers sec. 325, and where the only requirement to proceed is that a public <br /> officer process an application for compliance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, <br /> rules, and regulations, and the conditions attached to such approvals. Life of the Land v. <br /> City and County of Honolulu, 61 Haw. 390 (1979). <br /> <br /> A ministerial action will have precise, fixed standards. A building permit is a typical <br /> example of a ministerial permit. The Building Code sets out minimum requirements for a <br /> building, such as the spacing of floor joists, the required window area, the width of <br /> doorways, and the like. If the building meets these minimum requirements, the building <br /> official reviewing the permit has no discretion to refuse to issue the permit. In land use <br /> law, the ministerial approvals, such as building permits and driveway permits, typically <br /> follow the discretionary approvals, such as a rezoning. <br /> <br /> A change of zone, or an amendment to an existing zoning is a legislative act, Save Sunset <br /> Beach Coalition v. City and County of Honolulu, 102 Haw. 465 (2003). It is <br /> discretionary (as are all legislative acts) because the decisionmaker-the County <br /> Council-must use its judgment in deciding whether or not to approve the rezoning or the <br /> proposed amendment. <br /> <br /> Kohala LLC has no vested rights to proceed with its development under RS-15 zoning <br /> because the time conditions to perform on that zoning have lapsed. It needs several <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.