My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1077.000 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 1077.000 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 10:50:59 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 7:16:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
1077
Point
000
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 03/24/2008 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Plannning Committee (PC)
BIL 265 Draft 01 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
ORD 2008-066 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2008
REP PC 078 03/24/2008 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2006-2008\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> WATANABE: Cause I'm not sure you want to make that call on the fly. Does that satisfy <br /> you? <br /> <br /> IWASHITA: Sorry I made work for you, Ivan. <br /> <br /> WATANABE: I beg your pardon? <br /> <br /> IWASHITA: Just apologies to Ivan on the record. <br /> <br /> WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman? <br /> <br /> WATANABE: Yes, Mr. Woodward. <br /> <br /> WOODWARD: If I might have one question. If we change the language on this, do we <br /> have to bring it back here again? I mean it has to go to Kona. If we change the language does it <br /> have to come back here? <br /> <br /> WATANABE: It may, yeah. It may if the language is, I would say, substantive, a <br /> substantive change. It sounds like it may not really be a substantive change, if anything. <br /> <br /> WOODWARD: Thank you. <br /> <br /> WATANABE: And, again, I'm not sure that it would even come about at this point. I <br /> would leave it up to the experts. <br /> <br /> WOODWARD: That would be Mr. Torigoe's call, I would think. <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA: Mr. Chair? <br /> <br /> WATANABE: Yes, Mr. Alameda. <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA: Just one final thought on my end. So if the Board of Appeals, how many <br /> members on the Board of Appeals? <br /> <br /> YUEN: Seven. <br /> ALAMEDA: Okay. And if their job primarily is to keep the Director in check from <br /> running amuck, they wouldn't consider this action on the Director's part as part of running <br /> amuck, or would they embrace this action on your part, Mr. Director? <br /> <br /> YUEN: Well, the Board of Appeals still has jurisdiction over the violation. So if <br /> they think it's not a violation, they can reverse the violation; and then there's no violation and <br /> there's no fine. The person can also appeal, for example, the amount of the fine. They typically <br /> appeal the whole idea of the violation. But the Board of Appeals can modify the Director's <br /> decision if, again, following the standard of review. If they find that it's arbitrary, capricious, <br /> violates the law, a clearly erroneous decision, they can reverse or modify the Director's decision. <br /> This doesn't take away that power from the Board of Appeals. All it does is if the Board of <br /> Appeals actually sustains the Director's decision then the person who has done the violation, if <br /> <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.