My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1113.000 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 1113.000 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2009 3:31:39 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 7:18:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
1113
Point
000
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 04/08/2008 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Plannning Committee (PC)
BIL 274 Draft 01 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
ORD 2008-072 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2008
REP PC 081 04/08/2008 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2006-2008\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The Planning Director is recommending that the Planning Commission send a favorable <br /> recommendation to the Hawaii County Council for the 5-year extension as well as the <br /> amendment to the increase to 25 lots. Are there any questions? <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: Yes. <br /> <br /> WATANABE: Yes, Ms. Siracusa. <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: Several, actually. One thing I would like to ask Mr. Torigoe since there <br /> are two parts to this, one is the time extension and the other is the lot increase, if we should take <br /> everything together? I mean in terms of discussion we can take everything together. But in <br /> terms of motions later on would we do two separate motions? <br /> <br /> TORIGOE: Well, I think, in the course of our discussion you'll kind of see how things <br /> are shaping up, you know, and then we can probably address that. As the discussion goes on you <br /> may find that, you know, you may want to go a particular direction on the time extension; and <br /> that may be dispositive. At that point you may decide that somebody should just make a motion <br /> along those lines. So it's kind of hard for me to, you know, try and draw lines for you at this <br /> point. <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: Okay, so we play it by ear then and see how things go. My question of <br /> Jeff is, Jeff, I'm a little bit confused about this. The project site is 41.75 acres and so we're being <br /> asked to rezoned all 41.75 but we'd only increase three lots? Is that <br /> <br /> DARROW: The actual project site, the entire project site is approximately 53 acres. <br /> That includes this extra portion here. The actual area that we're looking at for this amendment is <br /> the light green area that's identified as Agricultural-1 acre. The applicant is requesting an <br /> amendment to allow a 5-year time extension. <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: The 5-year part I got. What I'm confused about is those three lots <br /> <br /> DARROW: Okay. <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: They're not already zoned Ag-11 take it cause we're asking to do a <br /> rezoning. So they are, where are those three lots, and what are they zoned now? <br /> <br /> WATANABE: May I intercede. Actually they're not asking for a rezoning. It's just a <br /> change of conditions. And what we <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: We have change of zone, it's an amendment to a change of zone but it is <br /> a <br /> <br /> WATANABE: Yeah. Am I not correct, it's already zoned Ag-1 so you're not looking <br /> for <br /> <br /> DARROW: Yeah. If I could just give a brief explanation. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.